+134 functions banked total for this exemplar (1 + 133 members). Measured from the committed
progress.fleet.md, not projected: fn-count 317,762 -> 317,896; instr-weighted 82.9 -> 83.2%
(+43,818 ins); distinct-code 71.5 -> 72.3% (+126 unique fns — these members are genuine byte-
VARIANTS that each count distinctly, not free dedup).
VERIFY: R22 clean-fleet (make clean && extract-all && check-all) -> 140 passed, 0 failed of 140.
make report fail-closed green: dedup-check 1886 validated / 0 failed, C1 coverage 239604/239604,
0 NON_MATCHING in any default build (G4).
THE 4 FAILURES ARE CARRIED, NOT CONCLUDED. All four are ov_SC07_006/007/010/011 and all four differ
from the other 133 in exactly one way: their sibling TU is _jr_8016AE5C.c, not _jr_801734BC.c —
carved under func_8016AE5C, which was banked and swept in SESSION-21. That is the SAME four overlays
and the SAME carve the SESSION-21 checkpoint flagged as "worth checking first" for func_8016B6BC's
0/137, which turned out to be a transitive type-carry (§94) rather than a wall. Each sibling reverted
its byte-neutral self-decl edit cleanly, so no dead diff is left behind. Per §59 a sweep failure is a
per-sibling INTEGRATION signal, not a codegen verdict — read one sibling's real gate result
(COMPILE-fail vs byte-DIFF) before concluding.
Drew T
ea1d6587d6