drm/amd/display: Fix Coverity INTERGER_OVERFLOW within construct_integrated_info
[Why] For substrcation, coverity reports integer overflow warning message when variable type is uint32_t. [How] Change varaible type to int32_t. Reviewed-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Hersen Wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2551,8 +2551,8 @@ static enum bp_result construct_integrated_info(
|
||||
|
||||
/* Sort voltage table from low to high*/
|
||||
if (result == BP_RESULT_OK) {
|
||||
uint32_t i;
|
||||
uint32_t j;
|
||||
int32_t i;
|
||||
int32_t j;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 1; i < NUMBER_OF_DISP_CLK_VOLTAGE; ++i) {
|
||||
for (j = i; j > 0; --j) {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3003,8 +3003,11 @@ static enum bp_result construct_integrated_info(
|
||||
struct atom_common_table_header *header;
|
||||
struct atom_data_revision revision;
|
||||
|
||||
uint32_t i;
|
||||
uint32_t j;
|
||||
int32_t i;
|
||||
int32_t j;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!info)
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
|
||||
if (info && DATA_TABLES(integratedsysteminfo)) {
|
||||
header = GET_IMAGE(struct atom_common_table_header,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user