thermal: core: Add sanity checks for polling_delay and passive_delay
If polling_delay is nonzero and passive_delay is greater than polling_delay, the thermal zone temperature will be updated less often when tz->passive is nonzero, which is not as expected. Make the thermal zone registration fail with -EINVAL in that case as this is a clear thermal zone configuration mistake. If polling_delay is nonzero and passive_delay is 0, which is regarded as a valid thermal zone configuration, the thermal zone will use polling except when tz->passive is nonzero. However, the expected behavior in that case is to continue temperature polling with the same delay value regardless of tz->passive, so set passive_delay to the polling_delay value then. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5802156.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1390,6 +1390,14 @@ thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(const char *type,
|
||||
if (num_trips > 0 && !trips)
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (polling_delay) {
|
||||
if (passive_delay > polling_delay)
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!passive_delay)
|
||||
passive_delay = polling_delay;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!thermal_class)
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user