mem->region is a struct resource, but mem->io_start and
mem->io_size are not for whatever reason. Let's unify this
and convert the io stuff into a struct resource as well.
Should make life a little less annoying when you don't have
juggle between two different approaches all the time.
Mostly done using cocci (with manual tweaks at all the
places where we mutate io_size by hand):
@@
struct intel_memory_region *M;
expression START, SIZE;
@@
- M->io_start = START;
- M->io_size = SIZE;
+ M->io = DEFINE_RES_MEM(START, SIZE);
@@
struct intel_memory_region *M;
@@
- M->io_start
+ M->io.start
@@
struct intel_memory_region M;
@@
- M.io_start
+ M.io.start
@@
expression M;
@@
- M->io_size
+ resource_size(&M->io)
@@
expression M;
@@
- M.io_size
+ resource_size(&M.io)
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240202224340.30647-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
intel_hdcp_component_init()->...->intel_hdcp_gsc_initialize_message()
will allocate ggtt address space for some hdcp gsc message thing.
That is currently being done way too early as we haven't even
taken over the BIOS fb yet. So this has the potential of corrupting
ggtt PTEs that need to be preserved until the BIOS fb takover
is done.
Only call intel_hdcp_component_init() once all the BIOS fb takeover,
and full ggtt init (which currently also needs to reserve very
specific ranges of ggtt, thus assuming that no one else has stolen
them yet) is done.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231215110933.9188-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Instead of injecting extra crtc commits to serialize the global
state let's hand roll a bit of commit machinery to take care of
the hardware synchronization.
Rather than basing everything on the crtc commits we track these
as their own thing. I think this makes more sense as the hardware
blocks we are working with are not in any way tied to the pipes,
so the completion should not be tied in with the vblank machinery
either.
The difference to the old behaviour is that:
- we no longer pull extra crtcs into the commit which should
make drm_atomic_check_only() happier
- since those crtcs don't get pulled in we also don't end up
reprogamming them and thus don't need to wait their vblanks
to pass/etc. So this should be tad faster as well.
TODO: perhaps have each global object complete its own commit
once the post-plane update phase is done?
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6728
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231219130756.25986-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
drm_atomic_check_only() gets upset if we try to add extra crtcs
to any commit that isn't flagged with DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET.
This conflicts with how SAGV watermarks work on pre-ADL as we
need to manually switch over the SAGV watermarks before we can
safely enable SAGV.
So in order to make SAGV usage possible we need to compute each
pipe's use of SAGV watermarks as if there aren't any other
active pipes. Ie. if the current pipe isn't the one blocking
SAGV then we make it use the SAGV watermarks, even if some
other pipe prevents SAGV from actually being used. Otherwise
we could end up with a pipes using the normal watermarks (but
not blocking SAGV), and some other pipe in parallel enabling
SAGV, which would likely cause underruns.
The alternative approach of preventing SAGV usage until all
pipes simultanously end up using SAGV watermarks would only
really work if userspace always adds all pipes to every
commits, which isn't the case typically.
The downside of this is that we will end up using the less
optimal SAGV watermarks even if some other pipe prevents
SAGV from actually being enabled. In which case the system
won't achieve the minimum possible power consumption.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231219130756.25986-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Some registers for DDI A/B moved to PICA and now follow the same format
as the ones for the PORT_TC ports. The wrapper here deals with 2 issues:
- Share the implementation between xe2lpd and previous
platforms: there are minor layout changes, it's mostly the
register location that changed
- Handle offsets after TC ports
v2:
- Explain better the trick to use just the second range (Matt Roper)
- Add missing conversions after rebase (Matt Roper)
- Use macro instead of inline function, avoiding includes in the
header (Jani)
- Prefix old macros with underscore so they don't get used by mistake,
and name the new ones using the previous names
v3: Use the same logic for the recently-introduced XELPDP_PORT_MSGBUS_TIMER
(Gustavo)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240126224638.4132016-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Bits to enable/disable and check state for D2D moved from
XELPDP_PORT_BUF_CTL1 to DDI_BUF_CTL (now named DDI_CTL_DE in the spec).
Make the functions mtl_ddi_disable_d2d() and mtl_ddi_enable_d2d generic
to work with multiple reg location and bitfield layout.
v2: Set/Clear XE2LPD_DDI_BUF_D2D_LINK_ENABLE in saved_port_bits when
enabling/disabling D2D so DDI_BUF_CTL is correctly programmed in
other places without overriding these bits (Clint)
v3: Leave saved_port_bits alone as those bits are not meant to be
modified outside of the port initialization. Rather propagate the
additional bit in DDI_BUF_CTL to be set when that register is
written again after D2D is enabled.
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240126224638.4132016-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Currently icl_compute_tc_phy_dplls() assumes that the active
PLL will be the TC PLL (as opposed to the TBT PLL). The actual
PLL will be selected during the modeset enable sequence, but
we need to put *something* into the crtc_state->shared_dpll
already during compute_config().
The downside of assuming one PLL or the other is that we'll
fail to fastset if the assumption doesn't match what was in
use previously. So let's instead keep the same PLL that was
in use previously (assuming there was one). This should allow
fastset to work again when using TBT PLL, at least in the
steady state.
Now, assuming we want keep the same PLL may not be entirely
correct either. But we should be covered by the type-c link
reset handling which will force a full modeset by flagging
connectors_changed=true which means the resulting modeset
can't be converted into a fastset even if the full crtc state
looks identical.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240118142436.25928-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
This reverts commit cfeff354f7.
A core design consideration with legacy cursor updates is that the
cursor must not touch any other plane, even if we were to force it
to take the slow path. That is the real reason why the cursor uses
a fixed ddb allocation, not because bspec says so.
Treating cursors as any other plane during ddb allocation
violates that, which means we can now pull other planes into
fully unsynced legacy cursor mailbox commits. That is
definitely not something we've ever considered when designing
the rest of the code. The noarm+arm register write split in
particular makes that dangerous as previous updates can get
disarmed pretty much at any random time, and not necessarily
in an order that is actually safe (eg. against ddb overlaps).
So if we were to do this then:
- someone needs to expend the appropriate amount of brain
cells thinking through all the tricky details
- we should do it for all skl+ platforms since all
of those have double buffered wm/ddb registers. The current
arbitrary mtl+ cutoff doesn't really make sense
For the moment just go back to the original behaviour where
the cursor's ddb alloation does not change outside of
modeset/fastset. As of now anything else isn't safe.
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231213102519.13500-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Our legacy cursor updates are actually mailbox updates.
Ie. the hardware latches things once per frame on start of
vblank, but we issue an number of updates per frame,
withough any attempt to synchronize against the vblank
in software. So in theory only the last update issued
during the frame will latch, and the previous ones are
discarded.
However this can lead to problems with maintaining the
ggtt/iommu mappings as we have no idea which updates
will actually latch.
The problem is exacerbated by the hardware's annoying disarming
behaviour; any non-arming register write will disarm an already
armed update, only to be rearmed later by the arming register
(CURBASE in case of cursors). If a disarming write happens
just before the start of vblank, and the arming write happens
after start of vblank we have effectively prevented the hardware
from latching anything. And if we manage to straddle multiple
sequential vblank starts in this manner we effectively prevent
the hardware from latching any new registers for an arbitrary
amount of time. This provides more time for the (potentially
still in use by the hardware) gtt/iommu mappings to be torn
down.
A partial solution, of course, is to use vblank evasion to
avoid the register writes from spreading on both sides of
the start of vblank.
I've previously highlighted this problem as a general issue
affecting mailbox updates. I even added some notes to the
{i9xx,skl}_crtc_planes_update_arm() to remind us that the noarm
and arm phases both need to pulled into the vblank evasion
critical section if we actually decided to implement mailbox
updates in general. But as I never impelemented the noarm+arm
split for cursors we don't have to worry about that for the
moment.
We've been lucky enough so far that this hasn't really caused
problems. One thing that does help is that Xorg generally
sticks to the same cursor BO. But igt seems pretty good at
hitting this on MTL now, so apparently we have to start
thinking about this.
v2: Wait for PSR exit to avoid the vblank evasion timeout (1ms)
tripping due to PSR exit latency (~5ms typically)
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240116204927.23499-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
There isn't really any reason to make the caller suffer through
checking the vblank evasion min/max scanlines. If we somehow
ended up with bogus values (which really shouldn't happen)
then just skip the actual vblank evasion loop but otherwise
plow ahead as normal.
The only "real" change is that we now get+put a vblank reference
even if the min/max values are bogus, previously we skipped
directly to the end.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231213102519.13500-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
On HSW non-ULT (or at least on Dell Latitude E6540) external displays
start to flicker when we enable PSR on the eDP. We observe a much higher
SR and PC6 residency than should be possible with an external display,
and indeen much higher than what we observe with eDP disabled and
only the external display enabled. Looks like the hardware is somehow
ignoring the fact that the external display is active during PSR.
I wasn't able to redproduce this on my HSW ULT machine, or BDW.
So either there's something specific about this particular laptop
(eg. some unknown firmware thing) or the issue is limited to just
non-ULT HSW systems. All known registers that could affect this
look perfectly reasonable on the affected machine.
As a workaround let's unmask the LPSP event to prevent PSR entry
except while in LPSP mode (only pipe A + eDP active). This
will prevent PSR entry entirely when multiple pipes are active.
The one slight downside is that we now also prevent PSR entry
when driving eDP with pipe B or C, but I think that's a reasonable
tradeoff to avoid having to implement a more complex workaround.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 783d8b8087 ("drm/i915/psr: Re-enable PSR1 on hsw/bdw")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10092
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240118212131.31868-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
This reverts commit 88b065943c.
Lenovo 82TQ is unhappy if we do the display on sequence this
late. The display output shows severe corruption.
It's unclear if this is a failure on our part (perhaps
something to do with sending commands in LP mode after HS
/video mode transmission has been started? Though the backlight
on command at least seems to work) or simply that there are
some commands in the sequence that are needed to be done
earlier (eg. could be some DSC init stuff?). If the latter
then I don't think the current Windows code would work
either, but maybe this was originally tested with an older
driver, who knows.
Root causing this fully would likely require a lot of
experimentation which isn't really feasible without direct
access to the machine, so let's just accept failure and
go back to the original sequence.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10071
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240116210821.30194-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Document nested struct members with full names as described in
Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst.
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'lock' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'guc_ids' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'num_guc_ids' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'guc_ids_bitmap' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'guc_id_list' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'guc_ids_in_use' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'destroyed_contexts' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'destroyed_worker' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'reset_fail_worker' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'reset_fail_mask' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'sched_disable_delay_ms' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'sched_disable_gucid_threshold' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'lock' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'gt_stamp' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'ping_delay' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'work' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'shift' description in 'intel_guc'
intel_guc.h:305: warning: Excess struct member 'last_stat_jiffies' description in 'intel_guc'
18 warnings as Errors
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231226195432.10891-3-rdunlap@infradead.org
(cherry picked from commit e4cf1a70fa)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
MST connectors don't have a static attached encoder, as their encoder
can change depending on the pipe they use; so the encoder for an MST
connector can't be retrieved using intel_dp_attached_encoder() (which
may return NULL for MST). Most of the PSR debugfs entries depend on a
static connector -> encoder mapping which is only true for eDP and SST
DP connectors and not for MST. These debugfs entries were enabled for
MST connectors as well recently to provide PR information for them, but
handling MST connectors needs more changes.
Fix this by not adding for now the PSR entries on MST connectors. To
make things more uniform add the entries for SST connectors on all
platforms, not just on platforms supporting DP2.0.
v2:
- Keep adding the entries for SST connectors. (Jouni)
- Add a TODO: comment for MST support.
Fixes: ef75c25e8f ("drm/i915/panelreplay: Debugfs support for panel replay")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/9850
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240103152609.2434100-1-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 9b0b61c5bc)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Add pll selection check for C20 as well as
clock state verification0. We have been relying
on sw state to select A or B pll's. This is incorrect
as the hw might see this selection differently. This
patch fixes this shortcoming by reading pll selection
for both sw and hw states and compares if these two
selections match.
Fixes: 59be90248b ("drm/i915/mtl: C20 state verification")
v2: reword commit message and include fix to a
original commit (Imre)
Compare pll selection (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240102115741.118525-2-mika.kahola@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit f4304beadd)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
