docs(experiment): update capability coverage after return fixes

Co-authored-by: gensokyo-dev <342580529+gensokyo-dev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kaoru0822 <208281322+kaoru0822-kitauji@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
N0zoM1z0
2026-10-16 23:34:49 +00:00
parent c8d8319367
commit bde56bc2bc
2 changed files with 19 additions and 5 deletions
+9 -2
View File
@@ -26,8 +26,15 @@ evidence; the shared bounded producer preserves space/width and uncertainty.
All three real models now complete the behavior-level task. Code Mode takes
151.3 seconds / 388,365 cumulative input tokens, Direct 164.9 / 515,929 and
traditional 345.7 / 681,613. Code has more uncached input than traditional and
more memory than Direct. A native BTI/PLT identity/no-return boundary remains
under investigation.
more memory than Direct. These are the earlier pinned measurements.
The [return-coverage study](aarch64-return-study.md) subsequently fixes two
independent producer defects: BTI import-entry identity and false no-return
promotion that erased the post-warning path. All three fresh model answers pass
the same selected task. Direct uses 351,157 cumulative input tokens / 139.0
seconds, Code Mode 371,571 / 166.8, and traditional 662,683 / 263.1. Code Mode
reduces MCP requests but adds model responses in this sample; correct primitives
and fewer RPCs do not establish a stable adapter advantage.
The [architecture storage study](storage-study.md) adds exact native register-name
and address-space queries, sharing one bounded immutable capture per lease.
+10 -3
View File
@@ -104,6 +104,13 @@ SSH checks verify both warning owners, callers, selected machine words and
77 GOT-slot reads. Coverage stays bounded and does not propagate live GOT
contents. Traditional C/assembly preflight can answer the same new behavior-level
question, avoiding a baseline missing necessary facts. All three real models
complete it, while token/time/resource tradeoffs remain mixed. All preserve the
recovered no-return disagreement and use machine facts for the post-call path;
a native BTI/veneer identity split is a concrete next investigation.
complete it, while token/time/resource tradeoffs remain mixed. That pinned run
preserves the recovered no-return disagreement and uses machine facts for the
post-call path.
The [return-coverage study](aarch64-return-study.md) fixes the BTI entry split
and a separate false no-return promotion through the native owners. The fresh
three-way task passes with the strict call restored in both atomic captures;
their complete selected function documents agree. Direct has lower input,
time and CPU than Code Mode in this sample. Memory, analysis-profile differences,
the common client executor and n=1 sampling prevent a universal adapter claim.