## Summary
This PR updates our E721 implementation and semantics to match the
updated `pycodestyle` logic, which I think is an improvement.
Specifically, we now allow `type(obj) is int` for exact type
comparisons, which were previously impossible. So now, we're largely
just linting against code like `type(obj) == int`.
This change is gated to preview mode.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7904.
## Test Plan
Updated the test fixture and ensured parity with latest Flake8.
This is my first PR and I'm new at rust, so feel free to ask me to
rewrite everything if needed ;)
The rule must be called after deferred lambas have been visited because
of the last check (whether the lambda parameters are used in the body of
the function that's being called). I didn't know where to do it, so I
did what I could to be able to work on the rule itself:
- added a `ruff_linter::checkers::ast::analyze::lambda` module
- build a vec of visited lambdas in `visit_deferred_lambdas`
- call `analyze::lambda` on the vec after they all have been visited
Building that vec of visited lambdas was necessary so that bindings
could be properly resolved in the case of nested lambdas.
Note that there is an open issue in pylint for some false positives, do
we need to fix that before merging the rule?
https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/issues/8192
Also, I did not provide any fixes (yet), maybe we want do avoid merging
new rules without fixes?
## Summary
Checks for lambdas whose body is a function call on the same arguments
as the lambda itself.
### Bad
```python
df.apply(lambda x: str(x))
```
### Good
```python
df.apply(str)
```
## Test Plan
Added unit test and snapshot.
Manually compared pylint and ruff output on pylint's test cases.
## References
- [pylint
documentation](https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide/messages/warning/unnecessary-lambda.html)
- [pylint
implementation](https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/blob/main/pylint/checkers/base/basic_checker.py#L521-L587)
- https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970
Given `print(*a_list_with_elements, sep="\n")`, we can't remove the
separator (unlike in `print(a, sep="\n")`), since we don't know how many
arguments were provided.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8078.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
In https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7968, I introduced a
regression whereby we started to treat imports used _only_ in type
annotation bounds (with `__future__` annotations) as unused.
The root of the issue is that I started using `visit_annotation` for
these bounds. So we'd queue up the bound in the list of deferred type
parameters, then when visiting, we'd further queue it up in the list of
deferred type annotations... Which we'd then never visit, since deferred
type annotations are visited _before_ deferred type parameters.
Anyway, the better solution here is to use a dedicated flag for these,
since they have slightly different behavior than type annotations.
I've also fixed what I _think_ is a bug whereby we previously failed to
resolve `Callable` in:
```python
type RecordCallback[R: Record] = Callable[[R], None]
from collections.abc import Callable
```
IIUC, the values in type aliases should be evaluated lazily, like type
parameters.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8017.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
### What it does
This rule triggers an error when a bare raise statement is not in an
except or finally block.
### Why is this bad?
If raise statement is not in an except or finally block, there is no
active exception to
re-raise, so it will fail with a `RuntimeError` exception.
### Example
```python
def validate_positive(x):
if x <= 0:
raise
```
Use instead:
```python
def validate_positive(x):
if x <= 0:
raise ValueError(f"{x} is not positive")
```
## Test Plan
Added unit test and snapshot.
Manually compared ruff and pylint outputs on pylint's tests.
## References
- [pylint
documentation](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/stable/user_guide/messages/error/misplaced-bare-raise.html)
- [pylint
implementation](https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/blob/main/pylint/checkers/exceptions.py#L339)
## Summary
Given `type RecordOrThings = Record | int | str`, the right-hand side
won't be evaluated at runtime. Same goes for `Record` in `type
RecordCallback[R: Record] = Callable[[R], None]`. This PR modifies the
visitation logic to treat them as typing-only.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7966.
## Summary
This PR fixes the bug where the rule `E251` was being triggered on a equal token
inside a f-string which was used in the context of debug expressions.
For example, the following was being flagged before the fix:
```python
print(f"{foo = }")
```
But, now it is not. This leads to false negatives such as:
```python
print(f"{foo(a = 1)}")
```
One solution would be to know if the opened parentheses was inside a f-string or
not. If it was then we can continue flagging until it's closed. If not, then we
should not flag it.
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and check that they don't raise any false positives.
fixes: #7882
## Summary
`foo(**{})` was an overlooked edge case for `PIE804` which introduced a
crash within the Fix, introduced in #7884.
I've made it so that `foo(**{})` turns into `foo()` when applied with
`--fix`, but is that desired/expected? 🤔 Should we just ignore instead?
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Given:
```python
baz: Annotated[
str,
[qux for qux in foo],
]
```
We treat `baz` as `BindingKind::Annotation`, to ensure that references
to `baz` are marked as unbound. However, we were _also_ treating `qux`
as `BindingKind::Annotation`, which meant that the load in the
comprehension _also_ errored.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7879.
## Summary
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7618.
The list of builtin iterator is not exhaustive.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
``` python
a = [1, 2]
examples = [
enumerate(a),
filter(lambda x: x, a),
map(int, a),
reversed(a),
zip(a),
iter(a),
]
for example in examples:
print(next(example))
```
## Summary
Implement
[`no-single-item-in`](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/iterable/no_single_item_in.py)
as `single-item-membership-test` (`FURB171`).
Uses the helper function `generate_comparison` from the `pycodestyle`
implementations; this function should probably be moved, but I am not
sure where at the moment.
Update: moved it to `ruff_python_ast::helpers`.
Related to #1348.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR resolves an issue raised in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/7810, whereby we don't fix
an f-string that exceeds the line length _even if_ the resultant code is
_shorter_ than the current code.
As part of this change, I've also refactored and extracted some common
logic we use around "ensuring a fix isn't breaking the line length
rules".
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
- Only trigger for immediately adjacent isinstance() calls with the same
target
- Preserve order of or conditions
Two existing tests changed:
- One was incorrectly reordering the or conditions, and is now correct.
- Another was combining two non-adjacent isinstance() calls. It's safe
enough in that example,
but this isn't safe to do in general, and it feels low-value to come up
with a heuristic for
when it is safe, so it seems better to not combine the calls in that
case.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7797
## Summary
Check that the sequence type is a list, set, dict, or tuple before
recommending replacing the `enumerate(...)` call with `range(len(...))`.
Document behaviour so users are aware of the type inference limitation
leading to false negatives.
Closes#7656.
## Summary
We'll revert back to the crates.io release once it's up-to-date, but
better to get this out now that Python 3.12 is released.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
If we have, e.g.:
```python
sum((
factor.dims for factor in bases
), [])
```
We generate three edits: two insertions (for the `operator` and
`functools` imports), and then one replacement (for the `sum` call
itself). We need to ensure that the insertions come before the
replacement; otherwise, the edits will appear overlapping and
out-of-order.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7718.
## Summary
This PR modifies the `line-too-long` and `doc-line-too-long` rules to
ignore lines that are too long due to the presence of a pragma comment
(e.g., `# type: ignore` or `# noqa`). That is, if a line only exceeds
the limit due to the pragma comment, it will no longer be flagged as
"too long". This behavior mirrors that of the formatter, thus ensuring
that we don't flag lines under E501 that the formatter would otherwise
avoid wrapping.
As a concrete example, given a line length of 88, the following would
_no longer_ be considered an E501 violation:
```python
# The string literal is 88 characters, including quotes.
"shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:sh" # type: ignore
```
This, however, would:
```python
# The string literal is 89 characters, including quotes.
"shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:sha" # type: ignore
```
In addition to mirroring the formatter, this also means that adding a
pragma comment (like `# noqa`) won't _cause_ additional violations to
appear (namely, E501). It's very common for users to add a `# type:
ignore` or similar to a line, only to find that they then have to add a
suppression comment _after_ it that was required before, as in `# type:
ignore # noqa: E501`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7471.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
The parser now uses the raw source code as global context and slices
into it to parse debug text. It turns out we were always passing in the
_old_ source code, so when code was fixed, we were making invalid
accesses. This PR modifies the call to use the _fixed_ source code,
which will always be consistent with the tokens.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7711.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This wasn't necessary in the past, since we _only_ applied this rule to
bodies that contained two statements, one of which was a `pass`. Now
that it applies to any `pass` in a block with multiple statements, we
can run into situations in which we remove both passes, and so need to
apply the fixes in isolation.
See:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7455#issuecomment-1741107573.
## Summary
Extend `unnecessary-pass` (`PIE790`) to trigger on all unnecessary
`pass` statements by checking for `pass` statements in any class or
function body with more than one statement.
Closes#7600.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Part of #1646.
## Summary
Implement `S505`
([`weak_cryptographic_key`](https://bandit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugins/b505_weak_cryptographic_key.html))
rule from `bandit`.
For this rule, `bandit` [reports the issue
with](https://github.com/PyCQA/bandit/blob/1.7.5/bandit/plugins/weak_cryptographic_key.py#L47-L56):
- medium severity for DSA/RSA < 2048 bits and EC < 224 bits
- high severity for DSA/RSA < 1024 bits and EC < 160 bits
Since Ruff does not handle severities for `bandit`-related rules, we
could either report the issue if we have lower values than medium
severity, or lower values than high one. Two reasons led me to choose
the first option:
- a medium severity issue is still a security issue we would want to
report to the user, who can then decide to either handle the issue or
ignore it
- `bandit` [maps the EC key algorithms to their respective key lengths
in
bits](https://github.com/PyCQA/bandit/blob/1.7.5/bandit/plugins/weak_cryptographic_key.py#L112-L133),
but there is no value below 160 bits, so technically `bandit` would
never report medium severity issues for EC keys, only high ones
Another consideration is that as shared just above, for EC key
algorithms, `bandit` has a mapping to map the algorithms to their
respective key lengths. In the implementation in Ruff, I rather went
with an explicit list of EC algorithms known to be vulnerable (which
would thus be reported) rather than implementing a mapping to retrieve
the associated key length and comparing it with the minimum value.
## Test Plan
Snapshot tests from
https://github.com/PyCQA/bandit/blob/1.7.5/examples/weak_cryptographic_key_sizes.py.
## Summary
`PGH002`, which checks for use of deprecated `logging.warn` calls, did
not check for calls made on the attribute `warn` yet. Since
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7521 we check both cases for
similar rules wherever possible. To be consistent this PR expands PGH002
to do the same.
## Test Plan
Expanded existing fixtures with `logger.warn()` calls
## Issue links
Fixes final inconsistency mentioned in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7502
## Summary
This PR adds support for named expressions when analyzing `__all__`
assignments, as per https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7672. It
also loosens the enforcement around assignments like: `__all__ =
list(some_other_expression)`. We shouldn't flag these as invalid, even
though we can't analyze the members, since we _know_ they evaluate to a
`list`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7672.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Fixes#7616 by ensuring that
[B006](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/mutable-argument-default/#mutable-argument-default-b006)
fixes are inserted after module imports.
I have created a new test file, `B006_5.py`. This is mainly because I
have been working on this on and off, and the merge conflicts were
easier to handle in a separate file. If needed, I can move it into
another file.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Expands several rules to also check for `Expr::Name` values. As they
would previously not consider:
```python
from logging import error
error("foo")
```
as potential violations
```python
import logging
logging.error("foo")
```
as potential violations leading to inconsistent behaviour.
The rules impacted are:
- `BLE001`
- `TRY400`
- `TRY401`
- `PLE1205`
- `PLE1206`
- `LOG007`
- `G001`-`G004`
- `G101`
- `G201`
- `G202`
## Test Plan
Fixtures for all impacted rules expanded.
## Issue Link
Refers: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7502
**Summary** Check that `closefd` and `opener` aren't being used with
`builtin.open()` before suggesting `Path.open()` because pathlib doesn't
support these arguments.
Closes#7620
**Test Plan** New cases in the fixture.
## Summary
This is a follow-up to #7469 that attempts to achieve similar gains, but
without introducing malachite. Instead, this PR removes the `BigInt`
type altogether, instead opting for a simple enum that allows us to
store small integers directly and only allocate for values greater than
`i64`:
```rust
/// A Python integer literal. Represents both small (fits in an `i64`) and large integers.
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
pub struct Int(Number);
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
pub enum Number {
/// A "small" number that can be represented as an `i64`.
Small(i64),
/// A "large" number that cannot be represented as an `i64`.
Big(Box<str>),
}
impl std::fmt::Display for Number {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
match self {
Number::Small(value) => write!(f, "{value}"),
Number::Big(value) => write!(f, "{value}"),
}
}
}
```
We typically don't care about numbers greater than `isize` -- our only
uses are comparisons against small constants (like `1`, `2`, `3`, etc.),
so there's no real loss of information, except in one or two rules where
we're now a little more conservative (with the worst-case being that we
don't flag, e.g., an `itertools.pairwise` that uses an extremely large
value for the slice start constant). For simplicity, a few diagnostics
now show a dedicated message when they see integers that are out of the
supported range (e.g., `outdated-version-block`).
An additional benefit here is that we get to remove a few dependencies,
especially `num-bigint`.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR fixes the autofix behavior for `PT022` to create an additional
edit for the return type if it's present. The edit will update the
return type from `Generator[T, ...]` to `T`. As per the [official
documentation](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html?highlight=typing%20generator#typing.Generator),
the first position is the yield type, so we can ignore other positions.
```python
typing.Generator[YieldType, SendType, ReturnType]
```
## Test Plan
Add new test cases, `cargo test` and review the snapshots.
fixes: #7610
## Summary
Implement
[`simplify-print`](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/builtin/print.py)
as `print-empty-string` (`FURB105`).
Extends the original rule in that it also checks for multiple empty
string positional arguments with an empty string separator.
Related to #1348.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Charlie Marsh
Flowrey
Steve C
Clément Schreiner
Valeriy Savchenko
Sven Hager
Victor Hugo Gomes
Jake Park
Harutaka Kawamura
Dhruv Manilawala
Zanie Blue
Simon Høxbro Hansen
Tom Kuson
Jelle Zijlstra
konsti
Daniel Parizher
Mathieu Kniewallner
qdegraaf