## Summary
This PR updates our E721 implementation and semantics to match the
updated `pycodestyle` logic, which I think is an improvement.
Specifically, we now allow `type(obj) is int` for exact type
comparisons, which were previously impossible. So now, we're largely
just linting against code like `type(obj) == int`.
This change is gated to preview mode.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7904.
## Test Plan
Updated the test fixture and ensured parity with latest Flake8.
## Summary
This PR updates our documentation for the upcoming formatter release.
Broadly, the documentation is now structured as follows:
- Overview
- Tutorial
- Installing Ruff
- The Ruff Linter
- Overview
- `ruff check`
- Rule selection
- Error suppression
- Exit codes
- The Ruff Formatter
- Overview
- `ruff format`
- Philosophy
- Configuration
- Format suppression
- Exit codes
- Black compatibility
- Known deviations
- Configuring Ruff
- pyproject.toml
- File discovery
- Configuration discovery
- CLI
- Shell autocompletion
- Preview
- Rules
- Settings
- Integrations
- `pre-commit`
- VS Code
- LSP
- PyCharm
- GitHub Actions
- FAQ
- Contributing
The major changes include:
- Removing the "Usage" section from the docs, and instead folding that
information into "Integrations" and the new Linter and Formatter
sections.
- Breaking up "Configuration" into "Configuring Ruff" (for generic
configuration), and new Linter- and Formatter-specific sections.
- Updating all example configurations to use `[tool.ruff.lint]` and
`[tool.ruff.format]`.
My suggestion is to pull and build the docs locally, and review by
reading them in the browser rather than trying to parse all the code
changes.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7235.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7647.
This is my first PR and I'm new at rust, so feel free to ask me to
rewrite everything if needed ;)
The rule must be called after deferred lambas have been visited because
of the last check (whether the lambda parameters are used in the body of
the function that's being called). I didn't know where to do it, so I
did what I could to be able to work on the rule itself:
- added a `ruff_linter::checkers::ast::analyze::lambda` module
- build a vec of visited lambdas in `visit_deferred_lambdas`
- call `analyze::lambda` on the vec after they all have been visited
Building that vec of visited lambdas was necessary so that bindings
could be properly resolved in the case of nested lambdas.
Note that there is an open issue in pylint for some false positives, do
we need to fix that before merging the rule?
https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/issues/8192
Also, I did not provide any fixes (yet), maybe we want do avoid merging
new rules without fixes?
## Summary
Checks for lambdas whose body is a function call on the same arguments
as the lambda itself.
### Bad
```python
df.apply(lambda x: str(x))
```
### Good
```python
df.apply(str)
```
## Test Plan
Added unit test and snapshot.
Manually compared pylint and ruff output on pylint's test cases.
## References
- [pylint
documentation](https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide/messages/warning/unnecessary-lambda.html)
- [pylint
implementation](https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/blob/main/pylint/checkers/base/basic_checker.py#L521-L587)
- https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970
## Summary
The lint checks for number of arguments in a function *definition*, but
the message says “function *call*”
## Test Plan
See what breaks and change the tests
Given `print(*a_list_with_elements, sep="\n")`, we can't remove the
separator (unlike in `print(a, sep="\n")`), since we don't know how many
arguments were provided.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8078.
- Add changelog entry for 0.1.1
- Bump version to 0.1.1
- Require preview for fix added in #7967
- Allow duplicate headings in changelog (markdownlint setting)
## Summary
In #6157 a warning was introduced when users use `ruff: noqa`
suppression in-line instead of at the file-level. I had this trigger
today after forgetting about it, and the warning is an excellent
improvement.
I knew immediately what the issue was because I raised it previously,
but on reading the warning I'm not sure it would be so obvious to all
users. This PR extends the error with a short sentence explaining that
line-level suppression should omit the `ruff:` prefix.
## Test Plan
Not sure it's necessary for such a trivial change :)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
In https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7968, I introduced a
regression whereby we started to treat imports used _only_ in type
annotation bounds (with `__future__` annotations) as unused.
The root of the issue is that I started using `visit_annotation` for
these bounds. So we'd queue up the bound in the list of deferred type
parameters, then when visiting, we'd further queue it up in the list of
deferred type annotations... Which we'd then never visit, since deferred
type annotations are visited _before_ deferred type parameters.
Anyway, the better solution here is to use a dedicated flag for these,
since they have slightly different behavior than type annotations.
I've also fixed what I _think_ is a bug whereby we previously failed to
resolve `Callable` in:
```python
type RecordCallback[R: Record] = Callable[[R], None]
from collections.abc import Callable
```
IIUC, the values in type aliases should be evaluated lazily, like type
parameters.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8017.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Rule B005 of flake8-bugbear docs has a typo in one of the examples that
leads to a confusion in the correctness of `.strip()` method
```python
# Wrong output (used in docs)
"text.txt".strip(".txt") # "ex"
# Correct output
"text.txt".strip(".txt") # "e"
```
## Summary
### What it does
This rule triggers an error when a bare raise statement is not in an
except or finally block.
### Why is this bad?
If raise statement is not in an except or finally block, there is no
active exception to
re-raise, so it will fail with a `RuntimeError` exception.
### Example
```python
def validate_positive(x):
if x <= 0:
raise
```
Use instead:
```python
def validate_positive(x):
if x <= 0:
raise ValueError(f"{x} is not positive")
```
## Test Plan
Added unit test and snapshot.
Manually compared ruff and pylint outputs on pylint's tests.
## References
- [pylint
documentation](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/stable/user_guide/messages/error/misplaced-bare-raise.html)
- [pylint
implementation](https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/blob/main/pylint/checkers/exceptions.py#L339)
## Summary
Given `type RecordOrThings = Record | int | str`, the right-hand side
won't be evaluated at runtime. Same goes for `Record` in `type
RecordCallback[R: Record] = Callable[[R], None]`. This PR modifies the
visitation logic to treat them as typing-only.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7966.
## Summary
This PR adds a new `cell` field to the JSON output format which
indicates the Notebook cell this diagnostic (and fix) belongs to. It
also updates the location for the diagnostic and fixes as per the
`NotebookIndex`. It will be used in the VSCode extension to display the
diagnostic in the correct cell.
The diagnostic and edit start and end source locations are translated
for the notebook as per the `NotebookIndex`. The end source location for
an edit needs some special handling.
### Edit end location
To understand this, the following context is required:
1. Visible lines in Jupyter Notebook vs JSON array strings: The newline
is part of the string in the JSON format. This means that if there are 3
visible lines in a cell where the last line is empty then the JSON would
contain 2 strings in the source array, both ending with a newline:
**JSON format:**
```json
[
"# first line\n",
"# second line\n",
]
```
**Notebook view:**
```python
1 # first line
2 # second line
3
```
2. If an edit needs to remove an entire line including the newline, then
the end location would be the start of the next row.
To remove a statement in the following code:
```python
import os
```
The edit would be:
```
start: row 1, col 1
end: row 2, col 1
```
Now, here's where the problem lies. The notebook index doesn't have any
information for row 2 because it doesn't exists in the actual notebook.
The newline was added by Ruff to concatenate the source code and it's
removed before writing back. But, the edit is computed looking at that
newline.
This means that while translating the end location for an edit belong to
a Notebook, we need to check if both the start and end location belongs
to the same cell. If not, then the end location should be the first
character of the next row and if so, translate that back to the last
character of the previous row. Taking the above example, the translated
location for Notebook would be:
```
start: row 1, col 1
end: row 1, col 10
```
## Test Plan
Add test cases for notebook output in the JSON format and update
existing snapshots.
## Summary
This PR refactors the `NotebookIndex` struct to use `OneIndexed` to make
the
intent of the code clearer.
## Test Plan
Update the existing test case and run `cargo test` to verify the change.
- [x] Verify `--diff` output
- [x] Verify the diagnostics output
- [x] Verify `--show-source` output
## Summary
This PR fixes the bug where the rule `E251` was being triggered on a equal token
inside a f-string which was used in the context of debug expressions.
For example, the following was being flagged before the fix:
```python
print(f"{foo = }")
```
But, now it is not. This leads to false negatives such as:
```python
print(f"{foo(a = 1)}")
```
One solution would be to know if the opened parentheses was inside a f-string or
not. If it was then we can continue flagging until it's closed. If not, then we
should not flag it.
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and check that they don't raise any false positives.
fixes: #7882
## Summary
`foo(**{})` was an overlooked edge case for `PIE804` which introduced a
crash within the Fix, introduced in #7884.
I've made it so that `foo(**{})` turns into `foo()` when applied with
`--fix`, but is that desired/expected? 🤔 Should we just ignore instead?
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7572
Drops formatting specific rules from the default rule set as they
conflict with formatters in general (and in particular, conflict with
our formatter). Most of these rules are in preview, but the removal of
`line-too-long` and `mixed-spaces-and-tabs` is a change to the stable
rule set.
## Example
The following no longer raises `E501`
```
echo "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx = 1" | ruff check -
```
## Summary
Throughout the codebase, we have this pattern:
```rust
let mut diagnostic = ...
if checker.patch(Rule::UnusedVariable) {
// Do the fix.
}
diagnostics.push(diagnostic)
```
This was helpful when we computed fixes lazily; however, we now compute
fixes eagerly, and this is _only_ used to ensure that we don't generate
fixes for rules marked as unfixable.
We often forget to add this, and it leads to bugs in enforcing
`--unfixable`.
This PR instead removes all of these checks, moving the responsibility
of enforcing `--unfixable` up to `check_path`. This is similar to how
@zanieb handled the `--extend-unsafe` logic: we post-process the
diagnostics to remove any fixes that should be ignored.
## Summary
Add autofix for `PLR1714` using tuples.
If added complexity is desired, we can lean into the `set` part by doing
some kind of builtin check on all of the comparator elements for
starters, since we otherwise don't know if something's hashable.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`, and manually.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7912
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Adds two configuration-file only settings `extend-safe-fixes` and
`extend-unsafe-fixes` which can be used to promote and demote the
applicability of fixes for rules.
Fixes with `Never` applicability cannot be promoted.
## Summary
Given:
```python
baz: Annotated[
str,
[qux for qux in foo],
]
```
We treat `baz` as `BindingKind::Annotation`, to ensure that references
to `baz` are marked as unbound. However, we were _also_ treating `qux`
as `BindingKind::Annotation`, which meant that the load in the
comprehension _also_ errored.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7879.
## Summary
This PR upgrades some rules from "sometimes" to "always" fixes, now that
we're getting ready to ship support in the CLI. The focus here was on
identifying rules for which the diagnostic itself is high-confidence,
and the fix itself is too (assuming that the diagnostic is correct).
This is _unlike_ rules that _may_ be a false positive, like those that
(e.g.) assume an object is a dictionary when you call `.values()` on it.
Specifically, I upgraded:
- A bunch of rules that only apply to `.pyi` files.
- Rules that rewrite deprecated imports or aliases.
- Some other misc. rules, like: `empty-print-string`, `unused-noqa`,
`getattr-with-constant`.
Open to feedback on any of these.
## Summary
Adds autofix to `PYI030`
Closes#7854.
Unsure if the cloning method I chose is the best solution here, feel
free to suggest alternatives!
## Test Plan
`cargo test` as well as manually
## Summary
Restores functionality of #7875 but in the correct place. Closes#7877.
~~I couldn't figure out how to get cargo fmt to work, so hopefully
that's run in CI.~~ Nevermind, figured it out.
## Test Plan
Can see output of json.
## Summary
Fixes#7853.
The old and new source files were reversed in the call to
`TextDiff::from_lines`, so the diff output of the CLI was also reversed.
## Test Plan
Two snapshots were updated in the process, so any reversal should be
caught :)
## Summary
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7618.
The list of builtin iterator is not exhaustive.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
``` python
a = [1, 2]
examples = [
enumerate(a),
filter(lambda x: x, a),
map(int, a),
reversed(a),
zip(a),
iter(a),
]
for example in examples:
print(next(example))
```
## Summary
Implement
[`no-single-item-in`](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/iterable/no_single_item_in.py)
as `single-item-membership-test` (`FURB171`).
Uses the helper function `generate_comparison` from the `pycodestyle`
implementations; this function should probably be moved, but I am not
sure where at the moment.
Update: moved it to `ruff_python_ast::helpers`.
Related to #1348.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Document the performance effects of `itertools.starmap`, including that
it is actually slower than comprehensions in Python 3.12.
Closes#7771.
## Test Plan
`python scripts/check_docs_formatted.py`
After working with the previous change in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7821 I found the names a bit
unclear and their relationship with the user-facing API muddied. Since
the applicability is exposed to the user directly in our JSON output, I
think it's important that these names align with our configuration
options. I've replaced `Manual` or `Never` with `Display` which captures
our intent for these fixes (only for display). Here, we create room for
future levels, such as `HasPlaceholders`, which wouldn't fit into the
`Always`/`Sometimes`/`Never` levels.
Unlike https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7819, this retains the
flat enum structure which is easier to work with.
Rebase of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/5119 authored by
@evanrittenhouse with additional refinements.
## Changes
- Adds `--unsafe-fixes` / `--no-unsafe-fixes` flags to `ruff check`
- Violations with unsafe fixes are not shown as fixable unless opted-in
- Fix applicability is respected now
- `Applicability::Never` fixes are no longer applied
- `Applicability::Sometimes` fixes require opt-in
- `Applicability::Always` fixes are unchanged
- Hints for availability of `--unsafe-fixes` added to `ruff check`
output
## Examples
Check hints at hidden unsafe fixes
```
❯ ruff check example.py --no-cache --select F601,W292
example.py:1:14: F601 Dictionary key literal `'a'` repeated
example.py:2:15: W292 [*] No newline at end of file
Found 2 errors.
[*] 1 fixable with the `--fix` option (1 hidden fix can be enabled with the `--unsafe-fixes` option).
```
We could add an indicator for which violations have hidden fixes in the
future.
Check treats unsafe fixes as applicable with opt-in
```
❯ ruff check example.py --no-cache --select F601,W292 --unsafe-fixes
example.py:1:14: F601 [*] Dictionary key literal `'a'` repeated
example.py:2:15: W292 [*] No newline at end of file
Found 2 errors.
[*] 2 fixable with the --fix option.
```
Also can be enabled in the config file
```
❯ cat ruff.toml
unsafe-fixes = true
```
And opted-out per invocation
```
❯ ruff check example.py --no-cache --select F601,W292 --no-unsafe-fixes
example.py:1:14: F601 Dictionary key literal `'a'` repeated
example.py:2:15: W292 [*] No newline at end of file
Found 2 errors.
[*] 1 fixable with the `--fix` option (1 hidden fix can be enabled with the `--unsafe-fixes` option).
```
Diff does not include unsafe fixes
```
❯ ruff check example.py --no-cache --select F601,W292 --diff
--- example.py
+++ example.py
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
x = {'a': 1, 'a': 1}
-print(('foo'))
+print(('foo'))
\ No newline at end of file
Would fix 1 error.
```
Unless there is opt-in
```
❯ ruff check example.py --no-cache --select F601,W292 --diff --unsafe-fixes
--- example.py
+++ example.py
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-x = {'a': 1}
-print(('foo'))
+x = {'a': 1, 'a': 1}
+print(('foo'))
\ No newline at end of file
Would fix 2 errors.
```
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7790 will improve the diff
messages following this pull request
Similarly, `--fix` and `--fix-only` require the `--unsafe-fixes` flag to
apply unsafe fixes.
## Related
Replaces #5119
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/4185
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7214
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/4845
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/3863
Addresses https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6835
Addresses https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7019
Needs follow-up https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6962
Needs follow-up https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/4845
Needs follow-up https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7436
Needs follow-up https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7025
Needs follow-up https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6434
Follow-up #7790
Follow-up https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7792
---------
Co-authored-by: Evan Rittenhouse <evanrittenhouse@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR resolves an issue raised in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/7810, whereby we don't fix
an f-string that exceeds the line length _even if_ the resultant code is
_shorter_ than the current code.
As part of this change, I've also refactored and extracted some common
logic we use around "ensuring a fix isn't breaking the line length
rules".
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
- Only trigger for immediately adjacent isinstance() calls with the same
target
- Preserve order of or conditions
Two existing tests changed:
- One was incorrectly reordering the or conditions, and is now correct.
- Another was combining two non-adjacent isinstance() calls. It's safe
enough in that example,
but this isn't safe to do in general, and it feels low-value to come up
with a heuristic for
when it is safe, so it seems better to not combine the calls in that
case.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7797
## Summary
Check that the sequence type is a list, set, dict, or tuple before
recommending replacing the `enumerate(...)` call with `range(len(...))`.
Document behaviour so users are aware of the type inference limitation
leading to false negatives.
Closes#7656.
## Summary
Two of the three listed examples were wrong: one was semantically
incorrect, another was _correct_ but not actually within the scope of
the rule.
Good motivation for us to start linting documentation examples :)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7773.
## Summary
We'll revert back to the crates.io release once it's up-to-date, but
better to get this out now that Python 3.12 is released.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR enables `ruff format` to format Jupyter notebooks.
Most of the work is contained in a new `format_source` method that
formats a generic `SourceKind`, then returns `Some(transformed)` if the
source required formatting, or `None` otherwise.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7598.
## Test Plan
Ran `cat foo.py | cargo run -p ruff_cli -- format --stdin-filename
Untitled.ipynb`; verified that the console showed a reasonable error:
```console
warning: Failed to read notebook Untitled.ipynb: Expected a Jupyter Notebook, which must be internally stored as JSON, but this file isn't valid JSON: EOF while parsing a value at line 1 column 0
```
Ran `cat Untitled.ipynb | cargo run -p ruff_cli -- format
--stdin-filename Untitled.ipynb`; verified that the JSON output
contained formatted source code.
## Summary
When writing back notebooks via `stdout`, we need to write back the
entire JSON content, not _just_ the fixed source code. Otherwise,
writing the output _back_ to the file will yield an invalid notebook.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7747
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
There's no way for users to fix this warning if they're intentionally
using an "invalid" PEP 593 annotation, as is the case in CPython. This
is a symptom of having warnings that aren't themselves diagnostics. If
we want this to be user-facing, we should add a diagnostic for it!
## Test Plan
Ran `cargo run -p ruff_cli -- check foo.py -n` on:
```python
from typing import Annotated
Annotated[int]
```
## Summary
If we have, e.g.:
```python
sum((
factor.dims for factor in bases
), [])
```
We generate three edits: two insertions (for the `operator` and
`functools` imports), and then one replacement (for the `sum` call
itself). We need to ensure that the insertions come before the
replacement; otherwise, the edits will appear overlapping and
out-of-order.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7718.
## Summary
This PR modifies the `line-too-long` and `doc-line-too-long` rules to
ignore lines that are too long due to the presence of a pragma comment
(e.g., `# type: ignore` or `# noqa`). That is, if a line only exceeds
the limit due to the pragma comment, it will no longer be flagged as
"too long". This behavior mirrors that of the formatter, thus ensuring
that we don't flag lines under E501 that the formatter would otherwise
avoid wrapping.
As a concrete example, given a line length of 88, the following would
_no longer_ be considered an E501 violation:
```python
# The string literal is 88 characters, including quotes.
"shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:sh" # type: ignore
```
This, however, would:
```python
# The string literal is 89 characters, including quotes.
"shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:sha" # type: ignore
```
In addition to mirroring the formatter, this also means that adding a
pragma comment (like `# noqa`) won't _cause_ additional violations to
appear (namely, E501). It's very common for users to add a `# type:
ignore` or similar to a line, only to find that they then have to add a
suppression comment _after_ it that was required before, as in `# type:
ignore # noqa: E501`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7471.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR implements a variety of optimizations to improve performance of
the Eradicate rule, which always shows up in all-rules benchmarks and
bothers me. (These improvements are not hugely important, but it was
kind of a fun Friday thing to spent a bit of time on.)
The improvements include:
- Doing cheaper work first (checking for some explicit substrings
upfront).
- Using `aho-corasick` to speed an exact substring search.
- Merging multiple regular expressions using a `RegexSet`.
- Removing some unnecessary `\s*` and other pieces from the regular
expressions (since we already trim strings before matching on them).
## Test Plan
I benchmarked this function in a standalone crate using a variety of
cases. Criterion reports that this version is up to 80% faster, and
almost every case is at least 50% faster:
```
Eradicate/Detection/# Warn if we are installing over top of an existing installation. This can
time: [101.84 ns 102.32 ns 102.82 ns]
change: [-77.166% -77.062% -76.943%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
Eradicate/Detection/#from foo import eradicate
time: [74.872 ns 75.096 ns 75.314 ns]
change: [-84.180% -84.131% -84.079%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
Eradicate/Detection/# encoding: utf8
time: [46.522 ns 46.862 ns 47.237 ns]
change: [-29.408% -28.918% -28.471%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
6 (6.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
Eradicate/Detection/# Issue #999
time: [16.942 ns 16.994 ns 17.058 ns]
change: [-57.243% -57.064% -56.815%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
Eradicate/Detection/# type: ignore
time: [43.074 ns 43.163 ns 43.262 ns]
change: [-17.614% -17.390% -17.152%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
Eradicate/Detection/# user_content_type, _ = TimelineEvent.objects.using(db_alias).get_or_create(
time: [209.40 ns 209.81 ns 210.23 ns]
change: [-32.806% -32.630% -32.470%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Eradicate/Detection/# this is = to that :(
time: [72.659 ns 73.068 ns 73.473 ns]
change: [-68.884% -68.775% -68.655%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%)
7 (7.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
Eradicate/Detection/#except Exception:
time: [92.063 ns 92.366 ns 92.691 ns]
change: [-64.204% -64.052% -63.909%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
Eradicate/Detection/#print(1)
time: [68.359 ns 68.537 ns 68.725 ns]
change: [-72.424% -72.356% -72.278%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
1 (1.00%) high mild
Eradicate/Detection/#'key': 1 + 1,
time: [79.604 ns 79.865 ns 80.135 ns]
change: [-69.787% -69.667% -69.549%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
```
## Summary
The parser now uses the raw source code as global context and slices
into it to parse debug text. It turns out we were always passing in the
_old_ source code, so when code was fixed, we were making invalid
accesses. This PR modifies the call to use the _fixed_ source code,
which will always be consistent with the tokens.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7711.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This wasn't necessary in the past, since we _only_ applied this rule to
bodies that contained two statements, one of which was a `pass`. Now
that it applies to any `pass` in a block with multiple statements, we
can run into situations in which we remove both passes, and so need to
apply the fixes in isolation.
See:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7455#issuecomment-1741107573.
## Summary
The markdown documentation was present, but in the wrong place, so was
not displaying on the website. I moved it and added some references.
Related to #2646.
## Test Plan
`python scripts/check_docs_formatted.py`
## Summary
Extend `unnecessary-pass` (`PIE790`) to trigger on all unnecessary
`pass` statements by checking for `pass` statements in any class or
function body with more than one statement.
Closes#7600.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Part of #1646.
## Summary
Implement `S505`
([`weak_cryptographic_key`](https://bandit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugins/b505_weak_cryptographic_key.html))
rule from `bandit`.
For this rule, `bandit` [reports the issue
with](https://github.com/PyCQA/bandit/blob/1.7.5/bandit/plugins/weak_cryptographic_key.py#L47-L56):
- medium severity for DSA/RSA < 2048 bits and EC < 224 bits
- high severity for DSA/RSA < 1024 bits and EC < 160 bits
Since Ruff does not handle severities for `bandit`-related rules, we
could either report the issue if we have lower values than medium
severity, or lower values than high one. Two reasons led me to choose
the first option:
- a medium severity issue is still a security issue we would want to
report to the user, who can then decide to either handle the issue or
ignore it
- `bandit` [maps the EC key algorithms to their respective key lengths
in
bits](https://github.com/PyCQA/bandit/blob/1.7.5/bandit/plugins/weak_cryptographic_key.py#L112-L133),
but there is no value below 160 bits, so technically `bandit` would
never report medium severity issues for EC keys, only high ones
Another consideration is that as shared just above, for EC key
algorithms, `bandit` has a mapping to map the algorithms to their
respective key lengths. In the implementation in Ruff, I rather went
with an explicit list of EC algorithms known to be vulnerable (which
would thus be reported) rather than implementing a mapping to retrieve
the associated key length and comparing it with the minimum value.
## Test Plan
Snapshot tests from
https://github.com/PyCQA/bandit/blob/1.7.5/examples/weak_cryptographic_key_sizes.py.
## Summary
Extend the `task-tags` checking logic to ignore TODO tags (with or
without parentheses). For example,
```python
# TODO(tjkuson): Rewrite in Rust
```
is no longer flagged as commented-out code.
Closes#7031.
I also updated the documentation to inform users that the rule is prone
to false positives like this!
EDIT: Accidentally linked to the wrong issue when first opening this PR,
now corrected.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Closes#7434
Replaces the `PREVIEW` selector (removed in #7389) with a configuration
option `explicit-preview-rules` which requires selectors to use exact
rule codes for all preview rules. This allows users to enable preview
without opting into all preview rules at once.
## Test plan
Unit tests
## Summary
`PGH002`, which checks for use of deprecated `logging.warn` calls, did
not check for calls made on the attribute `warn` yet. Since
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7521 we check both cases for
similar rules wherever possible. To be consistent this PR expands PGH002
to do the same.
## Test Plan
Expanded existing fixtures with `logger.warn()` calls
## Issue links
Fixes final inconsistency mentioned in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7502
## Summary
As we bind the `ast::ExprCall` in the big `match expr` in
`expression.rs`
```rust
Expr::Call(
call @ ast::ExprCall {
...
```
There is no need for additional `let/if let` checks on `ExprCall` in
downstream rules. Found a few older rules which still did this while
working on something else. This PR removes the redundant check from
these rules.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR adds support for named expressions when analyzing `__all__`
assignments, as per https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7672. It
also loosens the enforcement around assignments like: `__all__ =
list(some_other_expression)`. We shouldn't flag these as invalid, even
though we can't analyze the members, since we _know_ they evaluate to a
`list`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7672.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Fixes#7616 by ensuring that
[B006](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/mutable-argument-default/#mutable-argument-default-b006)
fixes are inserted after module imports.
I have created a new test file, `B006_5.py`. This is mainly because I
have been working on this on and off, and the merge conflicts were
easier to handle in a separate file. If needed, I can move it into
another file.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Expands several rules to also check for `Expr::Name` values. As they
would previously not consider:
```python
from logging import error
error("foo")
```
as potential violations
```python
import logging
logging.error("foo")
```
as potential violations leading to inconsistent behaviour.
The rules impacted are:
- `BLE001`
- `TRY400`
- `TRY401`
- `PLE1205`
- `PLE1206`
- `LOG007`
- `G001`-`G004`
- `G101`
- `G201`
- `G202`
## Test Plan
Fixtures for all impacted rules expanded.
## Issue Link
Refers: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7502
## Summary
Pass around a `Settings` struct instead of individual members to
simplify function signatures and to make it easier to add new settings.
This PR was suggested in [this
comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/1567#issuecomment-1734182803).
## Note on the choices
I chose which functions to modify based on which seem most likely to use
new settings, but suggestions on my choices are welcome!
**Summary** Check that `closefd` and `opener` aren't being used with
`builtin.open()` before suggesting `Path.open()` because pathlib doesn't
support these arguments.
Closes#7620
**Test Plan** New cases in the fixture.
## Summary
This is a follow-up to #7469 that attempts to achieve similar gains, but
without introducing malachite. Instead, this PR removes the `BigInt`
type altogether, instead opting for a simple enum that allows us to
store small integers directly and only allocate for values greater than
`i64`:
```rust
/// A Python integer literal. Represents both small (fits in an `i64`) and large integers.
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
pub struct Int(Number);
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
pub enum Number {
/// A "small" number that can be represented as an `i64`.
Small(i64),
/// A "large" number that cannot be represented as an `i64`.
Big(Box<str>),
}
impl std::fmt::Display for Number {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
match self {
Number::Small(value) => write!(f, "{value}"),
Number::Big(value) => write!(f, "{value}"),
}
}
}
```
We typically don't care about numbers greater than `isize` -- our only
uses are comparisons against small constants (like `1`, `2`, `3`, etc.),
so there's no real loss of information, except in one or two rules where
we're now a little more conservative (with the worst-case being that we
don't flag, e.g., an `itertools.pairwise` that uses an extremely large
value for the slice start constant). For simplicity, a few diagnostics
now show a dedicated message when they see integers that are out of the
supported range (e.g., `outdated-version-block`).
An additional benefit here is that we get to remove a few dependencies,
especially `num-bigint`.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR fixes the autofix behavior for `PT022` to create an additional
edit for the return type if it's present. The edit will update the
return type from `Generator[T, ...]` to `T`. As per the [official
documentation](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html?highlight=typing%20generator#typing.Generator),
the first position is the yield type, so we can ignore other positions.
```python
typing.Generator[YieldType, SendType, ReturnType]
```
## Test Plan
Add new test cases, `cargo test` and review the snapshots.
fixes: #7610
## Summary
Implement
[`simplify-print`](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/builtin/print.py)
as `print-empty-string` (`FURB105`).
Extends the original rule in that it also checks for multiple empty
string positional arguments with an empty string separator.
Related to #1348.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
B005 only flags `.strip()` calls for which the argument includes
duplicate characters. This is consistent with bugbear, but isn't
explained in the documentation.
## Summary
This is only used for the `level` field in relative imports (e.g., `from
..foo import bar`). It seems unnecessary to use a wrapper here, so this
PR changes to a `u32` directly.
## Summary
## Stack Summary
This stack splits `Settings` into `FormatterSettings` and `LinterSettings` and moves it into `ruff_workspace`. This change is necessary to add the `FormatterSettings` to `Settings` without adding `ruff_python_formatter` as a dependency to `ruff_linter` (and the linter should not contain the formatter settings).
A quick overview of our settings struct at play:
* `Options`: 1:1 representation of the options in the `pyproject.toml` or `ruff.toml`. Used for deserialization.
* `Configuration`: Resolved `Options`, potentially merged from multiple configurations (when using `extend`). The representation is very close if not identical to the `Options`.
* `Settings`: The resolved configuration that uses a data format optimized for reading. Optional fields are initialized with their default values. Initialized by `Configuration::into_settings` .
The goal of this stack is to split `Settings` into tool-specific resolved `Settings` that are independent of each other. This comes at the advantage that the individual crates don't need to know anything about the other tools. The downside is that information gets duplicated between `Settings`. Right now the duplication is minimal (`line-length`, `tab-width`) but we may need to come up with a solution if more expensive data needs sharing.
This stack focuses on `Settings`. Splitting `Configuration` into some smaller structs is something I'll follow up on later.
## PR Summary
This PR moves the `ResolverSettings` and `Settings` struct to `ruff_workspace`. `LinterSettings` remains in `ruff_linter` because it gets passed to lint rules, the `Checker` etc.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Stack Summary
This stack splits `Settings` into `FormatterSettings` and `LinterSettings` and moves it into `ruff_workspace`. This change is necessary to add the `FormatterSettings` to `Settings` without adding `ruff_python_formatter` as a dependency to `ruff_linter` (and the linter should not contain the formatter settings).
A quick overview of our settings struct at play:
* `Options`: 1:1 representation of the options in the `pyproject.toml` or `ruff.toml`. Used for deserialization.
* `Configuration`: Resolved `Options`, potentially merged from multiple configurations (when using `extend`). The representation is very close if not identical to the `Options`.
* `Settings`: The resolved configuration that uses a data format optimized for reading. Optional fields are initialized with their default values. Initialized by `Configuration::into_settings` .
The goal of this stack is to split `Settings` into tool-specific resolved `Settings` that are independent of each other. This comes at the advantage that the individual crates don't need to know anything about the other tools. The downside is that information gets duplicated between `Settings`. Right now the duplication is minimal (`line-length`, `tab-width`) but we may need to come up with a solution if more expensive data needs sharing.
This stack focuses on `Settings`. Splitting `Configuration` into some smaller structs is something I'll follow up on later.
## PR Summary
This PR extracts the linter-specific settings into a new `LinterSettings` struct and adds it as a `linter` field to the `Settings` struct. This is in preparation for moving `Settings` from `ruff_linter` to `ruff_workspace`
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Stack Summary
This stack splits `Settings` into `FormatterSettings` and `LinterSettings` and moves it into `ruff_workspace`. This change is necessary to add the `FormatterSettings` to `Settings` without adding `ruff_python_formatter` as a dependency to `ruff_linter` (and the linter should not contain the formatter settings).
A quick overview of our settings struct at play:
* `Options`: 1:1 representation of the options in the `pyproject.toml` or `ruff.toml`. Used for deserialization.
* `Configuration`: Resolved `Options`, potentially merged from multiple configurations (when using `extend`). The representation is very close if not identical to the `Options`.
* `Settings`: The resolved configuration that uses a data format optimized for reading. Optional fields are initialized with their default values. Initialized by `Configuration::into_settings` .
The goal of this stack is to split `Settings` into tool-specific resolved `Settings` that are independent of each other. This comes at the advantage that the individual crates don't need to know anything about the other tools. The downside is that information gets duplicated between `Settings`. Right now the duplication is minimal (`line-length`, `tab-width`) but we may need to come up with a solution if more expensive data needs sharing.
This stack focuses on `Settings`. Splitting `Configuration` into some smaller structs is something I'll follow up on later.
## PR Summary
This PR extracts a `ResolverSettings` struct that holds all the resolver-relevant fields (uninteresting for the `Formatter` or `Linter`). This will allow us to move the `ResolverSettings` out of `ruff_linter` further up in the stack.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
(I'll to more extensive testing at the top of this stack)
## Summary
This PR fixes the way NoQA range is inserted to the `NoqaMapping`.
Previously, the way the mapping insertion logic worked was as follows:
1. If the range which is to be inserted _touched_ the previous range, meaning
that the end of the previous range was the same as the start of the new
range, then the new range was added in addition to the previous range.
2. Else, if the new range intersected the previous range, then the previous
range was replaced with the new _intersection_ of the two ranges.
The problem with this logic is that it does not work for the following case:
```python
assert foo, \
"""multi-line
string"""
```
Now, the comments cannot be added to the same line which ends with a continuation
character. So, the `NoQA` directive has to be added to the next line. But, the
next line is also a triple-quoted string, so the `NoQA` directive for that line
needs to be added to the next line. This creates a **union** pattern instead of an
**intersection** pattern.
But, only union doesn't suffice because (1) means that for the edge case where
the range touch only at the end, the union won't take place.
### Solution
1. Replace '<=' with '<' to have a _strict_ insertion case
2. Use union instead of intersection
## Test Plan
Add a new test case. Run the test suite to ensure that nothing is broken.
### Integration
1. Make a `test.py` file with the following contents:
```python
assert foo, \
"""multi-line
string"""
```
2. Run the following command:
```console
$ cargo run --bin ruff -- check --isolated --no-cache --select=F821 test.py
/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/fstring.py:1:8: F821 Undefined name `foo`
Found 1 error.
```
3. Use `--add-noqa`:
```console
$ cargo run --bin ruff -- check --isolated --no-cache --select=F821 --add-noqa test.py
Added 1 noqa directive.
```
4. Check that the NoQA directive was added in the correct position:
```python
assert foo, \
"""multi-line
string""" # noqa: F821
```
5. Run the `check` command to ensure that the NoQA directive is respected:
```console
$ cargo run --bin ruff -- check --isolated --no-cache --select=F821 test.py
```
fixes: #7530
Charlie Marsh
Claudio Jolowicz
Flowrey
Steve C
Zanie Blue
Clément Schreiner
Valeriy Savchenko
Philipp A
Dhruv Manilawala
Micha Reiser
Tony Lykke
Ahmed Ashraf
Sven Hager
dependabot[bot]
Victor Hugo Gomes
Jake Park
Harutaka Kawamura
T-256
Henry Schreiner
Alex Waygood
bluthej
Simon Høxbro Hansen
Tom Kuson
Timo Brembeck
konsti
Jelle Zijlstra
jan Apisu
Daniel Parizher
Mathieu Kniewallner
qdegraaf