## Summary
This was just a bug in the parser ranges, probably since it was
initially implemented. Given `match n % 3, n % 5: ...`, the "subject"
(i.e., the tuple of two binary operators) was using the entire range of
the `match` statement.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8091.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR updates our E721 implementation and semantics to match the
updated `pycodestyle` logic, which I think is an improvement.
Specifically, we now allow `type(obj) is int` for exact type
comparisons, which were previously impossible. So now, we're largely
just linting against code like `type(obj) == int`.
This change is gated to preview mode.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7904.
## Test Plan
Updated the test fixture and ensured parity with latest Flake8.
## Summary
This PR updates our documentation for the upcoming formatter release.
Broadly, the documentation is now structured as follows:
- Overview
- Tutorial
- Installing Ruff
- The Ruff Linter
- Overview
- `ruff check`
- Rule selection
- Error suppression
- Exit codes
- The Ruff Formatter
- Overview
- `ruff format`
- Philosophy
- Configuration
- Format suppression
- Exit codes
- Black compatibility
- Known deviations
- Configuring Ruff
- pyproject.toml
- File discovery
- Configuration discovery
- CLI
- Shell autocompletion
- Preview
- Rules
- Settings
- Integrations
- `pre-commit`
- VS Code
- LSP
- PyCharm
- GitHub Actions
- FAQ
- Contributing
The major changes include:
- Removing the "Usage" section from the docs, and instead folding that
information into "Integrations" and the new Linter and Formatter
sections.
- Breaking up "Configuration" into "Configuring Ruff" (for generic
configuration), and new Linter- and Formatter-specific sections.
- Updating all example configurations to use `[tool.ruff.lint]` and
`[tool.ruff.format]`.
My suggestion is to pull and build the docs locally, and review by
reading them in the browser rather than trying to parse all the code
changes.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7235.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7647.
Adds a new `ruff version` sub-command which displays long version
information in the style of `cargo` and `rustc`. We include the number
of commits since the last release tag if its a development build, in the
style of Python's versioneer.
```
❯ ruff version
ruff 0.1.0+14 (947940e91 2023-10-18)
```
```
❯ ruff version --output-format json
{
"version": "0.1.0",
"commit_info": {
"short_commit_hash": "947940e91",
"commit_hash": "947940e91269f20f6b3f8f8c7c63f8e914680e80",
"commit_date": "2023-10-18",
"last_tag": "v0.1.0",
"commits_since_last_tag": 14
}
}%
```
```
❯ cargo version
cargo 1.72.1 (103a7ff2e 2023-08-15)
```
## Test plan
I've tested this manually locally, but want to at least add unit tests
for the message formatting. We'd also want to check the next release to
ensure the information is correct.
I checked build behavior with a detached head and branches.
## Future work
We could include rustc and cargo versions from the build, the current
Python version, and other diagnostic information for bug reports.
The `--version` and `-V` output is unchanged. However, we could update
it to display the long ruff version without the rust and cargo versions
(this is what cargo does). We'll need to be careful to ensure this does
not break downstream packages which parse our version string.
```
❯ ruff --version
ruff 0.1.0
```
The LSP should be updated to use `ruff version --output-format json`
instead of parsing `ruff --version`.
This is my first PR and I'm new at rust, so feel free to ask me to
rewrite everything if needed ;)
The rule must be called after deferred lambas have been visited because
of the last check (whether the lambda parameters are used in the body of
the function that's being called). I didn't know where to do it, so I
did what I could to be able to work on the rule itself:
- added a `ruff_linter::checkers::ast::analyze::lambda` module
- build a vec of visited lambdas in `visit_deferred_lambdas`
- call `analyze::lambda` on the vec after they all have been visited
Building that vec of visited lambdas was necessary so that bindings
could be properly resolved in the case of nested lambdas.
Note that there is an open issue in pylint for some false positives, do
we need to fix that before merging the rule?
https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/issues/8192
Also, I did not provide any fixes (yet), maybe we want do avoid merging
new rules without fixes?
## Summary
Checks for lambdas whose body is a function call on the same arguments
as the lambda itself.
### Bad
```python
df.apply(lambda x: str(x))
```
### Good
```python
df.apply(str)
```
## Test Plan
Added unit test and snapshot.
Manually compared pylint and ruff output on pylint's test cases.
## References
- [pylint
documentation](https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide/messages/warning/unnecessary-lambda.html)
- [pylint
implementation](https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/blob/main/pylint/checkers/base/basic_checker.py#L521-L587)
- https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970
## Summary
The lint checks for number of arguments in a function *definition*, but
the message says “function *call*”
## Test Plan
See what breaks and change the tests
Given `print(*a_list_with_elements, sep="\n")`, we can't remove the
separator (unlike in `print(a, sep="\n")`), since we don't know how many
arguments were provided.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8078.
- Add changelog entry for 0.1.1
- Bump version to 0.1.1
- Require preview for fix added in #7967
- Allow duplicate headings in changelog (markdownlint setting)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7448
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7892
I've removed automatic dangling comment formatting, we're doing manual
dangling comment formatting everywhere anyway (the
assert-all-comments-formatted ensures this) and dangling comments would
break the formatting there.
## Test Plan
New test file.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Split out of #8044: In preview style, ellipsis are also collapsed in
non-stub files. This should only affect function/class contexts since
for other statements stub are generally not used. I've updated our tests
to use `pass` instead to reflect this, which makes tracking the preview
style changes much easier.
## Summary
Given an expression like `[x for (x) in y]`, we weren't skipping over
parentheses when searching for the `in` between `(x)` and `y`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8053.
## Summary
In #6157 a warning was introduced when users use `ruff: noqa`
suppression in-line instead of at the file-level. I had this trigger
today after forgetting about it, and the warning is an excellent
improvement.
I knew immediately what the issue was because I raised it previously,
but on reading the warning I'm not sure it would be so obvious to all
users. This PR extends the error with a short sentence explaining that
line-level suppression should omit the `ruff:` prefix.
## Test Plan
Not sure it's necessary for such a trivial change :)
**Summary** `ruff format --diff` is similar to `ruff format --check`,
but we don't only error with the list of file that would be formatted,
but also show a diff between the unformatted input and the formatted
output.
```console
$ ruff format --diff scratch.py scratch.pyi scratch.ipynb
warning: `ruff format` is not yet stable, and subject to change in future versions.
--- scratch.ipynb
+++ scratch.ipynb
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
import numpy
-maths = (numpy.arange(100)**2).sum()
-stats= numpy.asarray([1,2,3,4]).median()
+
+maths = (numpy.arange(100) ** 2).sum()
+stats = numpy.asarray([1, 2, 3, 4]).median()
--- scratch.py
+++ scratch.py
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
x = 1
-y=2
+y = 2
z = 3
2 files would be reformatted, 1 file left unchanged
```
With `--diff`, the summary message gets printed to stderr to allow e.g.
`ruff format --diff . > format.patch`.
At the moment, jupyter notebooks are formatted as code diffs, while
everything else is a real diff that could be applied. This means that
the diffs containing jupyter notebooks are not real diffs and can't be
applied. We could change this to json diffs, but they are hard to read.
We could also split the diff option into a human diff option, where we
deviate from the machine readable diff constraints, and a proper machine
readable, appliable diff output that you can pipe into other tools.
To make the tests work, the results (and errors, if any) are sorted
before printing them. Previously, the print order was random, i.e. two
identical runs could have different output.
Open question: Should this go into the markdown docs? Or will this be
subsumed by the integration of the formatter into `ruff check`?
**Test plan** Fixtures for the change and no change cases, including a
jupyter notebook and for file input and stdin.
Fixes#7231
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
**Summary** Insert a newline after nested function and class
definitions, unless there is a trailing own line comment.
We need to e.g. format
```python
if platform.system() == "Linux":
if sys.version > (3, 10):
def f():
print("old")
else:
def f():
print("new")
f()
```
as
```python
if platform.system() == "Linux":
if sys.version > (3, 10):
def f():
print("old")
else:
def f():
print("new")
f()
```
even though `f()` is directly preceded by an if statement, not a
function or class definition. See the comments and fixtures for trailing
own line comment handling.
**Test Plan** I checked that the new content of `newlines.py` matches
black's formatting.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
When linting, we store a map from file path to fixes, which we then use
to show a fix summary in the printer.
In the printer, we assume that if the map is non-empty, then we have at
least one fix. But this isn't enforced by the fix struct, since you can
have an entry from (file path) to (empty fix table). In practice, this
only bites us when linting from `stdin`, since when linting across
multiple files, we have an `AddAssign` on `Diagnostics` that avoids
adding empty entries to the map. When linting from `stdin`, we create
the map directly, and so it _is_ possible to have a non-empty map that
doesn't contain any fixes, leading to a panic.
This PR introduces a dedicated struct to make these constraints part of
the formal interface.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8027.
## Test Plan
`cargo test` (notice two failures are removed)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
In https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7968, I introduced a
regression whereby we started to treat imports used _only_ in type
annotation bounds (with `__future__` annotations) as unused.
The root of the issue is that I started using `visit_annotation` for
these bounds. So we'd queue up the bound in the list of deferred type
parameters, then when visiting, we'd further queue it up in the list of
deferred type annotations... Which we'd then never visit, since deferred
type annotations are visited _before_ deferred type parameters.
Anyway, the better solution here is to use a dedicated flag for these,
since they have slightly different behavior than type annotations.
I've also fixed what I _think_ is a bug whereby we previously failed to
resolve `Callable` in:
```python
type RecordCallback[R: Record] = Callable[[R], None]
from collections.abc import Callable
```
IIUC, the values in type aliases should be evaluated lazily, like type
parameters.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8017.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Rule B005 of flake8-bugbear docs has a typo in one of the examples that
leads to a confusion in the correctness of `.strip()` method
```python
# Wrong output (used in docs)
"text.txt".strip(".txt") # "ex"
# Correct output
"text.txt".strip(".txt") # "e"
```
## Summary
Fix a typo in the docs for quote style.
> a = "a string without any quotes"
> b = "It's monday morning"
> Ruff will change a to use single quotes when using quote-style =
"single". However, a will be unchanged, as converting to single quotes
would require the inner ' to be escaped, which leads to less readable
code: 'It\'s monday morning'.
It should read "However, **b** will be unchanged".
## Test Plan
N/A.
## Summary
### What it does
This rule triggers an error when a bare raise statement is not in an
except or finally block.
### Why is this bad?
If raise statement is not in an except or finally block, there is no
active exception to
re-raise, so it will fail with a `RuntimeError` exception.
### Example
```python
def validate_positive(x):
if x <= 0:
raise
```
Use instead:
```python
def validate_positive(x):
if x <= 0:
raise ValueError(f"{x} is not positive")
```
## Test Plan
Added unit test and snapshot.
Manually compared ruff and pylint outputs on pylint's tests.
## References
- [pylint
documentation](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/stable/user_guide/messages/error/misplaced-bare-raise.html)
- [pylint
implementation](https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/blob/main/pylint/checkers/exceptions.py#L339)
See the provided breaking changes note for details.
Removes support for the deprecated `--format`option in the `ruff check`
CLI, `format` inference as `output-format` in the configuration file,
and the `RUFF_FORMAT` environment variable.
The error message for use of `format` in the configuration file could be
better, but would require some awkward serde wrappers and it seems hard
to present the correct schema to the user still.
## Summary
Given `type RecordOrThings = Record | int | str`, the right-hand side
won't be evaluated at runtime. Same goes for `Record` in `type
RecordCallback[R: Record] = Callable[[R], None]`. This PR modifies the
visitation logic to treat them as typing-only.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7966.
## Summary
Unlike other filepath-based settings, the `cache-dir` wasn't being
resolved relative to the project root, when specified as an absolute
path.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7958.
## Summary
This PR adds a new `cell` field to the JSON output format which
indicates the Notebook cell this diagnostic (and fix) belongs to. It
also updates the location for the diagnostic and fixes as per the
`NotebookIndex`. It will be used in the VSCode extension to display the
diagnostic in the correct cell.
The diagnostic and edit start and end source locations are translated
for the notebook as per the `NotebookIndex`. The end source location for
an edit needs some special handling.
### Edit end location
To understand this, the following context is required:
1. Visible lines in Jupyter Notebook vs JSON array strings: The newline
is part of the string in the JSON format. This means that if there are 3
visible lines in a cell where the last line is empty then the JSON would
contain 2 strings in the source array, both ending with a newline:
**JSON format:**
```json
[
"# first line\n",
"# second line\n",
]
```
**Notebook view:**
```python
1 # first line
2 # second line
3
```
2. If an edit needs to remove an entire line including the newline, then
the end location would be the start of the next row.
To remove a statement in the following code:
```python
import os
```
The edit would be:
```
start: row 1, col 1
end: row 2, col 1
```
Now, here's where the problem lies. The notebook index doesn't have any
information for row 2 because it doesn't exists in the actual notebook.
The newline was added by Ruff to concatenate the source code and it's
removed before writing back. But, the edit is computed looking at that
newline.
This means that while translating the end location for an edit belong to
a Notebook, we need to check if both the start and end location belongs
to the same cell. If not, then the end location should be the first
character of the next row and if so, translate that back to the last
character of the previous row. Taking the above example, the translated
location for Notebook would be:
```
start: row 1, col 1
end: row 1, col 10
```
## Test Plan
Add test cases for notebook output in the JSON format and update
existing snapshots.
## Summary
This PR refactors the `NotebookIndex` struct to use `OneIndexed` to make
the
intent of the code clearer.
## Test Plan
Update the existing test case and run `cargo test` to verify the change.
- [x] Verify `--diff` output
- [x] Verify the diagnostics output
- [x] Verify `--show-source` output
**Summary** Handle comment before the default values of function
parameters correctly by inserting a line break instead of space after
the equals sign where required.
```python
def f(
a = # parameter trailing comment; needs line break
1,
b =
# default leading comment; needs line break
2,
c = ( # the default leading can only be end-of-line with parentheses; no line break
3
),
d = (
# own line leading comment with parentheses; no line break
4
)
)
```
Fixes#7603
**Test Plan** Added the different cases and one more complex case as
fixtures.
## Summary
This PR fixes the bug where the rule `E251` was being triggered on a equal token
inside a f-string which was used in the context of debug expressions.
For example, the following was being flagged before the fix:
```python
print(f"{foo = }")
```
But, now it is not. This leads to false negatives such as:
```python
print(f"{foo(a = 1)}")
```
One solution would be to know if the opened parentheses was inside a f-string or
not. If it was then we can continue flagging until it's closed. If not, then we
should not flag it.
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and check that they don't raise any false positives.
fixes: #7882
## Summary
`foo(**{})` was an overlooked edge case for `PIE804` which introduced a
crash within the Fix, introduced in #7884.
I've made it so that `foo(**{})` turns into `foo()` when applied with
`--fix`, but is that desired/expected? 🤔 Should we just ignore instead?
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7572
Drops formatting specific rules from the default rule set as they
conflict with formatters in general (and in particular, conflict with
our formatter). Most of these rules are in preview, but the removal of
`line-too-long` and `mixed-spaces-and-tabs` is a change to the stable
rule set.
## Example
The following no longer raises `E501`
```
echo "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx = 1" | ruff check -
```
## Summary
Throughout the codebase, we have this pattern:
```rust
let mut diagnostic = ...
if checker.patch(Rule::UnusedVariable) {
// Do the fix.
}
diagnostics.push(diagnostic)
```
This was helpful when we computed fixes lazily; however, we now compute
fixes eagerly, and this is _only_ used to ensure that we don't generate
fixes for rules marked as unfixable.
We often forget to add this, and it leads to bugs in enforcing
`--unfixable`.
This PR instead removes all of these checks, moving the responsibility
of enforcing `--unfixable` up to `check_path`. This is similar to how
@zanieb handled the `--extend-unsafe` logic: we post-process the
diagnostics to remove any fixes that should be ignored.
## Summary
Add autofix for `PLR1714` using tuples.
If added complexity is desired, we can lean into the `set` part by doing
some kind of builtin check on all of the comparator elements for
starters, since we otherwise don't know if something's hashable.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`, and manually.
**Summary** Remove spaces from import statements such as
```python
import tqdm . tqdm
from tqdm . auto import tqdm
```
See also #7760 for a better solution.
**Test Plan** New fixtures
**Summary** Quoting of f-strings can change if they are triple quoted
and only contain single quotes inside.
Fixes#6841
**Test Plan** New fixtures
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7912
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Adds two configuration-file only settings `extend-safe-fixes` and
`extend-unsafe-fixes` which can be used to promote and demote the
applicability of fixes for rules.
Fixes with `Never` applicability cannot be promoted.
dependabot[bot]
Micha Reiser
Harutaka Kawamura
Charlie Marsh
Claudio Jolowicz
Flowrey
Zanie Blue
Steve C
Clément Schreiner
Valeriy Savchenko
Philipp A
Dhruv Manilawala
konsti
Tony Lykke
Ahmed Ashraf
Eiko Wagenknecht
Sven Hager
Victor Hugo Gomes
Jake Park
T-256