## Summary
While I was here, I also updated the rule to use
`function_type::classify` rather than hard-coding `staticmethod` and
friends.
Per Carl:
> Enum instances are already referred to by the class, forming a cycle
that won't get collected until the class itself does. At which point the
`lru_cache` itself would be collected, too.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9912.
## Summary
Historically, we only ignored `flake8-blind-except` if you re-raised or
logged the exception as a _direct_ child statement; but it could be
nested somewhere. This was just a known limitation at the time of adding
the previous logic.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11289.
Resolves#10390 and starts to address #10391
# Changes to behavior
* In `__init__.py` we now offer some fixes for unused imports.
* If the import binding is first-party this PR suggests a fix to turn it
into a redundant alias.
* If the import binding is not first-party, this PR suggests a fix to
remove it from the `__init__.py`.
* The fix-titles are specific to these new suggested fixes.
* `checker.settings.ignore_init_module_imports` setting is
deprecated/ignored. There is probably a documentation change to make
that complete which I haven't done.
---
<details><summary>Old description of implementation changes</summary>
# Changes to the implementation
* In the body of the loop over import statements that contain unused
bindings, the bindings are partitioned into `to_reexport` and
`to_remove` (according to how we want to resolve the fact they're
unused) with the following predicate:
```rust
in_init && is_first_party(checker, &import.qualified_name().to_string())
// true means make it a reexport
```
* Instead of generating a single fix per import statement, we now
generate up to two fixes per import statement:
```rust
(fix_by_removing_imports(checker, node_id, &to_remove, in_init).ok(),
fix_by_reexporting(checker, node_id, &to_reexport, dunder_all).ok())
```
* The `to_remove` fixes are unsafe when `in_init`.
* The `to_explicit` fixes are safe. Currently, until a future PR, we
make them redundant aliases (e.g. `import a` would become `import a as
a`).
## Other changes
* `checker.settings.ignore_init_module_imports` is deprecated/ignored.
Instead, all fixes are gated on `checker.settings.preview.is_enabled()`.
* Got rid of the pattern match on the import-binding bound by the inner
loop because it seemed less readable than referencing fields on the
binding.
* [x] `// FIXME: rename "imports" to "bindings"` if reviewer agrees (see
code)
* [x] `// FIXME: rename "node_id" to "import_statement"` if reviewer
agrees (see code)
<details>
<summary><h2>Scope cut until a future PR</h2></summary>
* (Not implemented) The `to_explicit` fixes will be added to `__all__`
unless it doesn't exist. When `__all__` doesn't exist they're resolved
by converting to redundant aliases (e.g. `import a` would become `import
a as a`).
---
</details>
# Test plan
* [x] `crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyflakes/F401_24`
contains an `__init__.py` with*out* `__all__` that exercises the
features in this PR, but it doesn't pass.
* [x]
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyflakes/F401_25_dunder_all`
contains an `__init__.py` *with* `__all__` that exercises the features
in this PR, but it doesn't pass.
* [x] Write unit tests for the new edit functions in
`fix::edits::make_redundant_alias`.
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
I think the check included here does make sense, but I don't see why we
would allow it if a value is provided for the attribute -- since, in
that case, isn't it _not_ abstract?
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11208.
## Summary
Implement duplicate code detection as part of `RUF100`, mirroring the
behavior of `flake8-noqa` (`NQA005`) mentioned in #850. The idea to
merge the rule into `RUF100` was suggested by @MichaReiser
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10325#issuecomment-2025535444.
## Test Plan
Test cases were added to the fixture.
## Summary
Based on discussion in #10850.
As it stands today `RUF100` will attempt to replace code redirects with
their target codes even though this is not the "goal" of `RUF100`. This
behavior is confusing and inconsistent, since code redirects which don't
otherwise violate `RUF100` will not be updated. The behavior is also
undocumented. Additionally, users who want to use `RUF100` but do not
want to update redirects have no way to opt out.
This PR explicitly detects redirects with a new rule `RUF101` and
patches `RUF100` to keep original codes in fixes and reporting.
## Test Plan
Added fixture.
## Summary
Resolves#11102
The error stems from these lines
f5c7a62aa6/crates/ruff_linter/src/noqa.rs (L697-L702)
I don't really understand the purpose of incrementing the last index,
but it makes the resulting range invalid for indexing into `contents`.
For now I just detect if the index is too high in `blanket_noqa` and
adjust it if necessary.
## Test Plan
Created fixture from issue example.
## Summary
This allows `raise from` in BLE001.
```python
try:
...
except Exception as e:
raise ValueError from e
```
Fixes#10806
## Test Plan
Test case added.
## Summary
Fixes#10463
Add `FURB192` which detects violations like this:
```python
# Bad
a = sorted(l)[0]
# Good
a = min(l)
```
There is a caveat that @Skylion007 has pointed out, which is that
violations with `reverse=True` technically aren't compatible with this
change, in the edge case where the unstable behavior is intended. For
example:
```python
from operator import itemgetter
data = [('red', 1), ('blue', 1), ('red', 2), ('blue', 2)]
min(data, key=itemgetter(0)) # ('blue', 1)
sorted(data, key=itemgetter(0))[0] # ('blue', 1)
sorted(data, key=itemgetter(0), reverse=True)[-1] # ('blue, 2')
```
This seems like a rare edge case, but I can make the `reverse=True`
fixes unsafe if that's best.
## Test Plan
This is unit tested.
## References
https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/pull/333/files
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
The `operator.itemgetter` behavior changes where there's more than one
argument, such that `operator.itemgetter(0)` yields `r[0]`, rather than
`(r[0],)`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11075.
Resolves#10187
<details>
<summary>Old PR description; accurate through commit e86dd7d; probably
best to leave this fold closed</summary>
## Description of change
In the case of a printf-style format string with only one %-placeholder
and a variable at right (e.g. `"%s" % var`):
* The new behavior attempts to dereference the variable and then match
on the bound expression to distinguish between a 1-tuple (fix), n-tuple
(bug 🐛), or a non-tuple (fix). Dereferencing is via
`analyze::typing::find_binding_value`.
* If the variable cannot be dereferenced, then the type-analysis routine
is called to distinguish only tuple (no-fix) or non-tuple (fix). Type
analysis is via `analyze::typing::is_tuple`.
* If any of the above fails, the rule still fires, but no fix is
offered.
## Alternatives
* If the reviewers think that singling out the 1-tuple case is too
complicated, I will remove that.
* The ecosystem results show that no new fixes are detected. So I could
probably delete all the variable dereferencing code and code that tries
to generate fixes, tbh.
## Changes to existing behavior
**All the previous rule-firings and fixes are unchanged except for** the
"false negatives" in
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_1.py`. Those
previous "false negatives" are now true positives and so I moved them to
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py`.
<details>
<summary>Existing false negatives that are now true positives</summary>
```
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:134:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
133 | # UP031 (no longer false negatives)
134 | 'Hello %s' % bar
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ UP031
135 |
136 | 'Hello %s' % bar.baz
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:136:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
134 | 'Hello %s' % bar
135 |
136 | 'Hello %s' % bar.baz
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ UP031
137 |
138 | 'Hello %s' % bar['bop']
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:138:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
136 | 'Hello %s' % bar.baz
137 |
138 | 'Hello %s' % bar['bop']
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ UP031
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
```
One of them newly offers a fix.
```
# UP031 (no longer false negatives)
-'Hello %s' % bar
+'Hello {}'.format(bar)
```
This fix occurs because the new code dereferences `bar` to where it was
defined earlier in the file as a non-tuple:
```python
bar = {"bar": y}
```
---
</details>
## Behavior requiring new tests
Additionally, we now handle a few cases that we didn't previously test.
These cases are when a string has a single %-placeholder and the
righthand operand to the modulo operator is a variable **which can be
dereferenced.** One of those was shown in the previous section (the
"dereference non-tuple" case).
<details>
<summary>New cases handled</summary>
```
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:126:1: UP031 [*] Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
125 | t1 = (x,)
126 | "%s" % t1
| ^^^^^^^^^ UP031
127 | # UP031: deref t1 to 1-tuple, offer fix
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:130:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
129 | t2 = (x,y)
130 | "%s" % t2
| ^^^^^^^^^ UP031
131 | # UP031: deref t2 to n-tuple, this is a bug
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
```
One of these offers a fix.
```
t1 = (x,)
-"%s" % t1
+"{}".format(t1[0])
# UP031: deref t1 to 1-tuple, offer fix
```
The other doesn't offer a fix because it's a bug.
---
</details>
---
</details>
## Changes to existing behavior
In the case of a string with a single %-placeholder and a single
ambiguous righthand argument to the modulo operator, (e.g. `"%s" % var`)
the rule now fires and offers a fix. We explain about this in the "fix
safety" section of the updated documentation.
## Documentation changes
I swapped the order of the "known problems" and the "examples" sections
so that the examples which describe the rule are first, before the
exceptions to the rule are described. I also tweaked the language to be
more explicit, as I had trouble understanding the documentation at
first. The "known problems" section is now "fix safety" but the content
is largely similar.
The diff of the documentation changes looks a little difficult unless
you look at the individual commits.
Add pylint rule invalid-hash-returned (PLE0309)
See https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970 for rules
Test Plan: `cargo test`
TBD: from the description: "Strictly speaking `bool` is a subclass of
`int`, thus returning `True`/`False` is valid. To be consistent with
other rules (e.g.
[PLE0305](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10962)
invalid-index-returned), ruff will raise, compared to pylint which will
not raise."
Add pylint rule invalid-length-returned (PLE0303)
See https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970 for rules
Test Plan: `cargo test`
TBD: from the description: "Strictly speaking `bool` is a subclass of
`int`, thus returning `True`/`False` is valid. To be consistent with
other rules (e.g.
[PLE0305](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10962)
invalid-index-returned), ruff will raise, compared to pylint which will
not raise."
## Summary
If the user is analyzing a script (i.e., we have no module path), it
seems reasonable to use the script name when trying to identify paths to
objects defined _within_ the script.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10960.
## Test Plan
Ran:
```shell
check --isolated --select=B008 \
--config 'lint.flake8-bugbear.extend-immutable-calls=["test.A"]' \
test.py
```
On:
```python
class A: pass
def f(a=A()):
pass
```
## Summary
This change adds a rule to detect functions declared `async` but lacking
any of `await`, `async with`, or `async for`. This resolves#9951.
## Test Plan
This change was tested by following
https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/contributing/#rule-testing-fixtures-and-snapshots
and adding positive and negative cases for each of `await` vs nothing,
`async with` vs `with`, and `async for` vs `for`.
## Summary
Adds more aggressive logic to PLR1730, `if-stmt-min-max`
Closes#10907
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
If `RUF100` was included in a per-file-ignore, we respected it on cases
like `# noqa: F401`, but not the blanket variant (`# noqa`).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10906.
## Summary
Implement new rule: Prefer augmented assignment (#8877). It checks for
the assignment statement with the form of `<expr> = <expr>
<binary-operator> …` with a unsafe fix to use augmented assignment
instead.
## Test Plan
1. Snapshot test is included in the PR.
2. Manually test with playground.
## Summary
This PR adds the implementation for the current
[flake8-bugbear](https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8-bugbear)'s B038 rule.
The B038 rule checks for mutation of loop iterators in the body of a for
loop and alerts when found.
Rational:
Editing the loop iterator can lead to undesired behavior and is probably
a bug in most cases.
Closes#9511.
Note there will be a second iteration of B038 implemented in
`flake8-bugbear` soon, and this PR currently only implements the weakest
form of the rule.
I'd be happy to also implement the further improvements to B038 here in
ruff 🙂
See https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8-bugbear/issues/454 for more
information on the planned improvements.
## Test Plan
Re-using the same test file that I've used for `flake8-bugbear`, which
is included in this PR (look for the `B038.py` file).
Note: this is my first time using `rust` (beside `rustlings`) - I'd be
very happy about thorough feedback on what I could've done better
🙂 - Bring it on 😀
## Summary
Implement `write-whole-file` (`FURB103`), part of #1348. This is largely
a copy and paste of `read-whole-file` #7682.
## Test Plan
Text fixture added.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
Improve `blanket-noqa` error message in cases where codes are provided
but not detected due to formatting issues. Namely `# noqa X100` (missing
colon) or `noqa : X100` (space before colon). The behavior is similar to
`NQA002` and `NQA003` from `flake8-noqa` mentioned in #850. The idea to
merge the rules into `PGH004` was suggested by @MichaReiser
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10325#issuecomment-2025535444.
## Test Plan
Test cases added to fixture.
## Summary
Fixes#3011.
Type checkers currently allow forward references in all contexts in stub
files, and stubs frequently make use of this capability (although it
doesn't actually seem to be specc'd anywhere --neither in PEP 484, nor
https://typing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/source/stubs.html#id6, nor the
CPython typing docs). Implementing it so that Ruff allows forward
references in _all contexts_ in stub files seems non-trivial, however
(or at least, I couldn't figure out how to do it easily), so this PR
does not do that. Perhaps it _should_; if we think this apporach isn't
principled enough, I'm happy to close it and postpone changing anything
here.
However, this does reduce the number of F821 errors Ruff emits on
typeshed down from 76 to 2, which would mean that we could enable the
rule at typeshed. The remaining 2 F821 errors can be trivially fixed at
typeshed by moving definitions around; forward references in class bases
were really the only remaining places where there was a real _use case_
for forward references in stub files that Ruff wasn't yet allowing.
## Test plan
`cargo test`. I also ran this PR branch on typeshed to check to see if
there were any new false positives caused by the changes here; there
were none.
## Summary
`Path.read_bytes()` does not support any keyword arguments, so `FURB101`
should not be triggered if the file is opened in `rb` mode with any
keyword arguments.
## Test Plan
Move erroneous test to "Non-error" section of fixture.
## Summary
Historically, given:
```python
__all__ = [ # noqa: F822
"Bernoulli",
"Beta",
"Binomial",
]
```
The F822 violations would be attached to the `__all__`, so this `# noqa`
would be enforced for _all_ definitions in the list. This changed in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10525 for the better, in that we
now use the range of each string. But these `# noqa` directives stopped
working.
This PR sets the `__all__` as a parent range in the diagnostic, so that
these directives are respected once again.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10795.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Add new rule `pyupgrade - UP042` (I picked next available number).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/3867
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9569
It should warn + provide a fix `class A(str, Enum)` -> `class
A(StrEnum)` for py311+.
## Test Plan
Added UP042.py test.
## Notes
I did not find a way to call `remove_argument` 2 times consecutively, so
the automatic fixing works only for classes that inherit exactly `str,
Enum` (regardless of the order).
I also plan to extend this rule to support IntEnum in next PR.
## Summary
This PR adds a new semantic model flag to indicate that the checker is
inside an f-string replacement field. This will be used to ignore
certain checks if the target version doesn't support a specific feature
like PEP 701.
fixes: #10761
## Test Plan
Add a test case from the raised issue.
Fixes#3259
## Summary
Renames `UnnecessaryComprehensionAnyAll` to
`UnnecessaryComprehensionInCall` and extends the check to `sum`, `min`,
and `max`, in addition to `any` and `all`.
## Test Plan
Updated snapshot test.
Built docs locally and verified the docs for this rule still render
correctly.
## Summary
We lost the per-rule ignores when these were migrated to the AST, so if
_any_ `Q` rule is enabled, they're now all enabled.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10724.
## Test Plan
Ran:
```shell
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q000
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q001
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q002
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q000,Q001
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q000,Q002
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q001,Q002
```
...against:
```python
'''
bad docsting
'''
a = 'single'
b = '''
bad multi line
'''
```
## Summary
An annotated lambda assignment within a class scope is often
intentional. For example, within a dataclass or Pydantic model, these
are treated as fields rather than methods (and so can be passed values
in constructors).
I originally wrote this to special-case dataclasses and Pydantic
models... But was left feeling like we'd see more false positives here
for little gain (an annotated lambda within a `class` is likely
intentional?). Open to opinions, though.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10718.
## Summary
Currently, [this
line](716688d44e/crates/ruff_linter/src/fix/edits.rs (L101))
assumes that the `noqa` comment begins with an octothorpe followed by a
space. (`# `) With anyone's random code, this of course is not always
true.
When there's a multi-byte character after the leading octothorpe, such
as
[`\u0085`](https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/85/index.htm),
we try slicing from within the character, causing a panic.
To fix this, the logic has been changed to remove unused `noqa`
directives and keep any trailing comments, or removing the whole comment
if the comment is just the unused `noqa`
Fixes#10097.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Implement FURB164 in the issue #1348.
Relevant Refurb docs is here:
https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/v2.0.0/docs/checks.md#furb164-no-from-float
I've changed the name from `no-from-float` to
`verbose-decimal-fraction-construction`.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I've written it in the `FURB164.py`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
When `relative-imports-order = "closest-to-furthest"` is set, we should
_still_ put non-relative imports after relative imports. It's rare for
them to be in the same section, but _possible_ if you use
`known-local-folder`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10655.
## Test Plan
New tests.
Also sorted this file:
```python
from ..models import ABC
from .models import Question
from .utils import create_question
from django_polls.apps.polls.models import Choice
```
With both:
- `isort view.py`
- `ruff check view.py --select I --fix`
And the following `pyproject.toml`:
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint.isort]
order-by-type = false
relative-imports-order = "closest-to-furthest"
known-local-folder = ["django_polls"]
[tool.isort]
profile = "black"
reverse_relative = true
known_local_folder = ["django_polls"]
```
I verified that Ruff and isort gave the same result, and that they
_still_ gave the same result when removing the relevant setting:
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint.isort]
order-by-type = false
known-local-folder = ["django_polls"]
[tool.isort]
profile = "black"
known_local_folder = ["django_polls"]
```
## Summary
Add a setting `extend-allowed-calls` to allow users to define their own
list of calls which allow boolean traps.
Resolves#10485.
Resolves#10356.
## Test Plan
Extended text fixture and added setting test.
## Summary
This PR fixes the bug for `DTZ007` rule where it didn't consider to
check for the presence of `%z` in f-strings. It also considers the
string parts of an implicitly concatenated f-strings for which I want to
find a better solution (#10308).
fixes: #10601
## Test Plan
Add test cases and update the snapshots.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Similar to #10419, there was a case where there is a collision of C401
and C416 (as discussed in #10101).
Fixed this by implementing short-circuit for the comprehension of the
form `{x for x in foo}`.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Extended `C401.py` with the case where `set` is not builtin function,
and divided the case where the short-circuit should occur.
Removed the last testcase of `print(f"{ {set(a for a in 'abc')} }")`
test as this is invalid as a python code, but should I keep this?
## Summary
This is not the holistic solution but just to fix that issue.
fixes: #10546
## Test Plan
Add a regression test for it and check the snapshots.
## Summary
Fixed false-positive on the rule `PLW1641`, where the explicit
assignment on the `__hash__` method is not counted as an definition of
`__hash__`. (Discussed in #10557).
Also, added one new testcase.
## Test Plan
Checked on `cargo test` in `eq_without_hash.py`.
Before the change, for the assignment into `__hash__`, only `__hash__ =
None` was counted as an explicit definition of `__hash__` method.
Probably any assignment into `__hash__` property could be counted as an
explicit definition of hash, so I removed `value.is_none_literal_expr()`
check.
## Summary
Closes#10228
The PR makes the blank lines rules keep track of the cell status when
running on a notebook, and makes the rules not trigger when the line is
the first of the cell.
## Test Plan
The example given in #10228 is added as a fixture, along with a few
tests from the main blank lines fixtures.
## Summary
Closes#10337.
I've fixed the code to count usage of variable.
Usage count inside the block is reset when there is a following
statement.
- continue
- break
- return
## Test Plan
Add test case.
## Summary
The fix for PYI025 is currently marked as unsafe in non-global scopes
for both `.py` and `.pyi` files, on the grounds that all global-scope
symbols in Python are implicitly exported from the module, so changing
the name of something in the global scope could break other modules that
import the module we're fixing. Unlike in `.py` files, however, imported
symbols are never implicitly re-exported from stub files. Symbols are
only understood by static analysis tools as being re-exported from stubs
if they are marked as explicit re-exports, which take three forms:
```py
from foo import * # all symbols from foo are re-exported from the stub
# the "redundant" alias marks it as an explicit re-export
# (note that the alias needs to be identical to the symbol's "actual" name
# in order for it to be a re-export)
from bar import barrr as barrr
# inclusion in __all__ also marks it as an explicit re-export,
# just like in `.py` files
from baz import bazzz
__all__ = ["bazzz"]
```
This is [specc'd in PEP
484](https://peps.python.org/pep-0484/#stub-files), and means that we
can mark the fix for PYI025 as safe in more cases for `.pyi` files.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`. An existing test case goes from being an unsafe fix to a
safe fix in a `.pyi` fixture. I also added a new fixture so we have
coverage of global-scope imports that are marked as re-exports using
"redundant" `from collections.abc import Set as Set` aliases.
## Summary
This error was found browsing
https://github.com/qarmin/Automated-Fuzzer/actions/runs/8396966850.
Which failed when trying to autofix the PT014 violation in the following
code:
```python
@pytest.mark.parametrize('data, spec', [(1.0, 1.0), (1.0, 1.0)])
def test_numbers(data, spec):
...
```
Investigation revealed that the implementation was not properly tested,
when the duplicate value was also the last in the list. In particular
the following function, which is in charge of finding the comma
following an element to create the suggested fix,
0a99bd84ce/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_pytest_style/rules/parametrize.rs (L647-L651)
would find the next comma even if it was outside the list itself leading
to a lot of code being deleted.
This PR fixes that.
## Test Plan
Added misbehaving code to the test fixture.
## Summary
Ensures that we use the raw identifier as provided in the source code,
rather than the normalized Unicode identifier.
This _does_ mean that we treat these as two separate identifiers, and
_don't_ merge them, even though Python will treat them as the same
symbol:
```python
import numpy as ℂℇℊℋℌℍℎℐℑℒℓℕℤΩℨKÅℬℭℯℰℱℹℴ
import numpy as CƐgHHHhIILlNZΩZKÅBCeEFio
```
I think that's fine, this is super rare anyway and would likely be
confusing for users.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10528.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
In https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10341, we fixed some false
positives in `.pyi` files, but introduced others. This PR effectively
reverts the change in #10341 and fixes it in a slightly different way.
Instead of changing the _bindings_ we generate in the semantic model in
`.pyi` files, we instead change how we _resolve_ them.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10509.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fix `E231` bug: Inconsistent catch compared to pycodestyle, such as when
dict nested in list. Resolves#10113.
## Test Plan
Example from #10113 added to test fixture.
## Summary
This PR fixes a panic in the linter for `W605`.
Consider the following f-string:
```python
f"{{}}ab"
```
The `FStringMiddle` token would contain `{}ab`. Notice that the escaped
braces have _reduced_ the string. This means we cannot use the text
value from the token to determine the location of the escape sequence
but need to extract it from the source code.
fixes: #10434
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and update the snapshots.
Tushar Sadhwani
Charlie Marsh
plredmond
Alex Waygood
Auguste Lalande
Jelle Zijlstra
Steve C
Sid
Ottavio Hartman
Jonathan Plasse
Tibor Reiss
Philipp Thiel
Hoël Bagard
wolfgangshi
Martin Imre
Aleksei Latyshev
Bohdan
Micha Reiser
Dhruv Manilawala
Carl Meyer
hikaru-kajita
Mateusz Sokół
yt2b
Sergey Chudov