Hello,
This MR adds a new rule and its fix, `RUF069`,
`DuplicateEntryInDunderAll`. I'm using `RUF069` because we already have
[RUF068](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/20585) and
[RUF069](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21079#issuecomment-3493839453)
in the works.
The rule job is to prevent users from accidentally adding duplicate
entries to `__all__`, which, for example, can result from copy-paste
mistakes.
It deals with the following syntaxes:
```python
__all__: list[str] = ["a", "a"]
__all__: typing.Any = ("a", "a")
__all__.extend(["a", "a"])
__all__ += ["a", "a"]
```
But it does not keep track of `__all__` contents, meaning the following
code snippet is a false negative:
```python
class A: ...
__all__ = ["A"]
__all__.extend(["A"])
```
## Violation Example
```console
RUF069 `__all__` contains duplicate entries
--> RUF069.py:2:17
|
1 | __all__ = ["A", "A", "B"]
| ^^^
help: Remove duplicate entries from `__all__`
1 | __all__ = ["A", "B"]
- __all__ = ["A", "A", "B"]
```
## Ecosystem Report
The `ruff-ecosystem` results contain seven violations in four projects,
all of them seem like true positives, with one instance appearing to be
an actual bug.
This [code
snippet](90d855985b/stubs/reportlab/reportlab/lib/rltempfile.pyi (L4))
from `reportlab` contains the same entry twice instead of exporting both
functions.
```python
def get_rl_tempdir(*subdirs: str) -> str: ...
def get_rl_tempfile(fn: str | None = None) -> str: ...
__all__ = ("get_rl_tempdir", "get_rl_tempdir")
```
Closes [#21945](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/21945)
---------
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
# Summary
- Report a single combined UnusedNOQA diagnostic when any range
suppression
has one or more unused, disabled, or duplicate lint codes.
- Report a single combined InvalidRuleCode diagnostic for any range
suppression
with one or more invalid lint codes.
# Test Plan
Updated fixtures and snapshots
Fixes#22429, #21873
## Summary
Currently we don't think that namespace packages (e.g. `google` after
you've pip-installed `google-cloud-ndb`) have attributes such as
`__file__`, `__name__`, etc. This PR fixes that.
## Test Plan
Mdtests and snapshots.
- Adds `Tokens::split_at()` to get tokens before/after an offset.
- Updates `Suppressions::load_from_tokens` to take an `Indexer` and use
comment ranges to minimize the need for walking tokens looking for
indent/dedent.
Adapted from
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21441#pullrequestreview-3503773083Fixes#22087
The implementation here is (to me) surprisingly complicated. The main
complications are:
1. Trying to limit the redundant detection to as few of the symbols
we extract as possible. In particular, while I haven't done benchmarking
on this, I perceive the redundancy detection to be somewhat expensive
and auto-import can return lots of symbols. So we're careful to only do
this extra checking on (typically) small groups of symbols that could
possibly be merged.
2. Even by restricting our work, this merging process could still be
called quite a bit. (Thousands of times in my "standard data scienc-y
test environment.") So I went out of my way to amortize allocs.
3. Re-exports can form a chain and we want to find all of them.
4. We (probably) don't want to remove redundant re-exports unless
they share the same top-level module. Otherwise, e.g., a library
that re-exports another library's symbols could have all of its
re-exports dropped.
5. We want to only keep the top-most re-exports, and there may be
multiple such re-exports. So we keep all of them.
6. We can't assume anything about the relationship of re-exports
and the original definition. A re-export could be deeper in the
module hierarchy than the original definition or above it.
The invariants established by the constructors for `ModuleName`
guarantee that this is always available. It's useful for
determining the "top level" module for where a symbol lives.
Previously, we were constructing this at a higher level layer. But this
commit pushes it down a layer of abstraction. This shouldn't result in
constructing the fully qualified name any more frequently than we
previously did. Namely, we're still only doing it for symbols that match
the caller provided search query.
The motivation here is that we want to do some de-duplication based on
module name, and having the fully qualified name of a symbol seems like
the most straight-forward way to go about this. (We'll need one more
piece of information that we add in a subsequent commit.)
Summary
--
The WASM builds in the 0.14.12 release were failing with an error about
trying
to publish over an existing version 5.8.1 ([example]). This seems to be
because
it's trying to publish a package named `pkg` instead of the `pkg`
directory.
Micha found that a trailing slash causes `npm` to interpret the path
correctly.
Test Plan
--
I think we can test this with a dry run of the release workflow,
otherwise
another release attempt for 0.14.12
[example]:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/actions/runs/21037103249/job/60492735499#step:5:281
## Summary
Prefer completions of type `ClassLiteral` inside class-def context.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1776
## Test Plan
New completion-eval test that has incorrect ranking on main but correct
after this patch.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/2488
When a type alias is defined using PEP 695's `type` statement syntax
(e.g., `type Array = Eager | Lazy`), overload resolution was failing
because the type alias was not being expanded into its underlying union
type.
This fix updates both `expand_type` and `is_expandable_type` in
`arguments.rs` to handle `Type::TypeAlias` by recursively checking and
expanding the alias's value type.
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/2015. We weren't recursing
into the value of a type alias when we should have been.
There are situations where we should also be recursing into the
bounds/constraints of a typevar. I initially tried to do that as well in
this PR, but that seems... trickier. For now I'm cutting scope; this PR
does, however, add several failing tests for those cases.
## Test Plan
added mdtests
## Summary
Fix issue #21889 by checking that the logging method is one of the
``debug``, ``info``, ``warning``, ``error``, ``exception``,
``critical``, ``log`` methods that support ``exc_info`` passing. Also
fixed the behavior in which ``exc_info`` was considered passed only when
it was equal to the literal ``True``, now the ``Truthiness`` of the
expression is checked (we will leave additional checks to type checkers)
## Test Plan
Additional snapshot tests have been added for all logging functions, as
well as tests in which an exception object is passed as ``exc_info``
---------
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
Resolves#22216.
This diff makes `RUF066` (`property-without-return`) respect the
`lint.pydocstyle.property-decorators` setting. `RUF066` is now
consistent with other rules that check for property methods like
`PLR0206`, `D401`, `PLR6301`, and `DOC201`
## Summary
just a little refactor.
Edit: okay, I removed a period at the end of a diagnostic message, which
I guess changes a _lot_ of diagnostic messages.
