THE BANK: the T14 PLUMBING census showed func_8014CF04 blocking THREE drafts at once. Conforming its
decl axis banked func_8014CF04 + func_8015D1B8 (func_80135260 is a genuine DIFF, agreeing with its
independent SESSION-21 diagnosis). R22 clean-fleet 140/140; report fail-closed green (dedup 1886/0,
0 NON_MATCHING). fn-count 317,896 -> 317,898; distinct 66,110 -> 66,111.
BUT THE AXIS WAS A 1,748-FILE T2 WRITE SET (the --check per-form counts read "1"), and R22 came back
139/140 -- TWICE -- on a change the per-binary gate called BYTE-IDENTICAL. Three defects (§98):
1. THE REGEX CROSSED NEWLINES. `[^;]*` matches '\n', so a match starting at a DEFINITION line ran
past the `{` to the first `;`, swallowing `s32 func_8014CF04(...) {` PLUS the register pin on the
next line and replacing both with a prototype -> undefined reference. Fixed to `[^;{\n]*`: a
definition is now unmatchable by construction.
2. IT REWROTE INSIDE COMMENTS (H5, 3 lines). Now scans cdecl._mask() and rewrites by SPAN (R33 --
that length-preserving primitive already existed for exactly this).
3. THE REAL CAUSE -- IT ASSUMED ONE SIGNATURE FITS THE FLEET. ov_SC07_006 carries its own banked
definition with a DIFFERENT byte-true signature ((s32,s32,void*) vs (s32,void*,void*)), under a
decl marked "per-overlay-local decl (byte-true sig); do NOT re-macroize". That is the Phase-16
loose-typing wall inside a tool that structurally assumes it away. NEW RULE: a TU that DEFINES the
function owns its own declarations; a fleet axis is meaningful only for CONSUMING TUs. This grows
more common as banking proceeds -- every overlay that banks a function becomes an exception.
Then the R32 completion assertion cried wolf on its own by-design skip ("HALF-AXIS -- DO NOT BUILD"
for a complete rewrite): an assertion must be exact about its DOMAIN, not just its condition. Scoped
to consuming TUs -> 1,747 sites, 1 excluded by design. Also hardened to PLAN -> VALIDATE -> WRITE;
the refusal path had aborted mid-write while claiming nothing was modified, creating the very
half-axis §85 calls a guaranteed break.
META (R22's premise, re-earned): after fixing defect 1 I EXPECTED R22 to pass; it failed again for an
unrelated reason, and an individual `make build` of the failing binary SUCCEEDED by reusing objects
the clean run rebuilds. An incremental pass does not refute a clean-tree failure.
Drew T
ad57c16e61