HARVEST (10 agents, 68 gap reports): 4 CONFIRMED, 3 REJECTED, 41 already-covered. Yield fell from
14 because the readers were seeded with §193 AND §194 AND §195 -- three sessions of laws off the
table before they started, which is the flywheel working.
§197-A IS BANKED AS ONE ENTRY WITH ITS ATTRIBUTION FLAGGED CONTESTED. Two verifiers independently
confirmed the same phenomenon (lhu;sll 16;sra 16+K where the target has lh;sra K) and attributed it
to DIFFERENT passes -- one to cse's fold_rtx associative block with -da dumps showing the middle insn
already gone in x.i.cse, one to combine preferring the count-merge over forming lh. R34 forbids
treating agreement between disagreeing oracles as corroboration, so the observable, the tell and the
cure (a zero-byte asm re-tie; a fresh temp works with no second SET at all) are banked, and the pass
question is recorded as open. Both verifiers independently byte-refuted §136 type-form rule 9's cure:
u16 v[4] and SVECTOR v compile BYTE-IDENTICALLY in rule 9's own context. Banner added at rule 9.
§198 (in the tool's own help text): UNKNOWN was excluded from the default --levers while the wave
PROMPT told every agent "UNKNOWN does NOT mean hard -- it means the atlas could not name a lever."
The tool was silently overriding the doctrine. Measured: UNKNOWN held 607 of 1,179 in-band members,
more than every other lane combined; wave W drew 73 cards from it into 3 gate groups (24.3 drafts per
rebuild vs wave V's 7.8) for 71/71 drafted, 68 banked. Recorded cost: UNKNOWN groups are mostly
singletons, so the free sibling remap yielded ZERO where waves T/U/V got 49/34/25.
Also releases func_80185480 and func_8017EC98 from wave W's spent-card file -- their agents died on
server rate-limiting and no draft exists, so they must not be marked already-waved.
Drew T
5f174cce53